<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>automatic grenade launcher (AGL) &#8211; Small Arms Defense Journal</title>
	<atom:link href="https://sadefensejournal.com/tag/automatic-grenade-launcher-agl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://sadefensejournal.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 01:20:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Torturing the Mk19 Mod 3: Performing the Full Mil-Spec Testing Protocol</title>
		<link>https://sadefensejournal.com/torturing-the-mk19-mod-3-performing-the-full-mil-spec-testing-protocol/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Shea]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Grenades & Rockets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automatic grenade launcher (AGL)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grenade Launchers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mk19]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. ORDNANCE]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sadefensejournal.com/?p=89271</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Since 2016, U.S. Ordnance has been the sole supplier of the U.S. Model MK19 Mod 3 and Mod 4 machine guns to U.S. military and other government agency end-users. In 2022, they were issued the NSN as sole supplier with an IDIQ contract of up to $50m. As we go to press, they are in [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Since 2016, U.S. Ordnance has been the sole supplier of the U.S. Model MK19 Mod 3 and Mod 4 machine guns to U.S. military and other government agency end-users. In 2022, they were issued the NSN as sole supplier with an IDIQ contract of up to $50m. As we go to press, they are in the first article testing phase of the contract, and we were allowed to participate in the testing. We previously reported on Phase I, and now we report on Phase II here. It’s an extensive inspection and live firing test.</p>



<p>Since U.S. Ordnance received the NSN and contract, they must perform “first article” inspection and testing. There are more than 186 parts inspections that must be accomplished. Each one must meet the military standards for production. There is also a testing protocol called for in <strong>MIL-G-70790 (AR)</strong>, the Military Specification for Gun, Machine, 40mm MK19 Mod 3, which must be strictly adhered to and passed with government inspectors viewing. In the previous article, we reviewed the relevant first parts of the testing we observed. Now it’s time to go live, but there are more checks to perform before we can start.</p>


<h2 id="tablepress-26-name" class="tablepress-table-name tablepress-table-name-id-26">MK19 Mod 3 Specifications</h2>

<table id="tablepress-26" class="tablepress tablepress-id-26" aria-labelledby="tablepress-26-name">
<tbody class="row-striping row-hover">
<tr class="row-1">
	<td class="column-1">Caliber</td><td class="column-2">40x53mm</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-2">
	<td class="column-1">Weight</td><td class="column-2">77.6 lb. (35.2kg) empty</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-3">
	<td class="column-1">Length</td><td class="column-2">43.1 in. (1090mm)</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-4">
	<td class="column-1">Width</td><td class="column-2">9.46 in. (240.4mm)</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-5">
	<td class="column-1">Barrel Length</td><td class="column-2">16.25 in. (413mm) (Removable)</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-6">
	<td class="column-1">Muzzle Velocity</td><td class="column-2">750-790 fps (230-240 m/s)</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-7">
	<td class="column-1">Effective Firing Range</td><td class="column-2">1,500m (1,600 yards)</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-8">
	<td class="column-1">Maximum Firing Range</td><td class="column-2">2,212m (2,419 yards)</td>
</tr>
<tr class="row-9">
	<td class="column-1">Feed system</td><td class="column-2">32 or 48 grenade belts in metal can, M16A2 link</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<!-- #tablepress-26 from cache -->


<p>In section 3.3 of the Mil-Spec, gun sights and bore calibration are checked. The wedge optic mount on the right side in the MWO has to be perfect for calibration, which we did check. Then, in 3.4 and 3.5, it’s an ammunition compatibility check to ensure all the various 40x53mm rounds will chamber and fire. Done. Then, as stated in 3.5.1, “<em>Proof Testing: The machine gun shall withstand the firing of one M385A1 40mm cartridge without any evidence of part failure, deformation, or loosening.”</em> Done.</p>



<p>The M385A1 round has a one-piece solid aluminum projectile with a rotating band in an M169 cartridge case. The propellant is M2 (4.2g, 0.15 oz.). The primer is an FED 215 percussion-type. The ogive of the M385 series matches the shape of the M430/A1 HEDP projectile, which has 45g (1.61 oz.) of Comp A5 explosive, a shaped charge with copper liner, and a pre-fragmented body. It’s just the ogive that matches. The M385 series frequently is indented at center, which is weight lightening to match the weight of the M430 round. The M385A1 uses M16A2 links only (The M385 can use either M16A1 or A2).</p>



<p>There are protocols, as mentioned. Firing must be done in a proper, specified cadence to allow proper cooling periods, simulating the long life of a MK19 Mod 3 in service. Cleaning intervals must be followed, as well as inspections, including some testing that might appear redundant, but is necessary to achieve the full results of the test.</p>



<p><strong><u>Benchmarks in the MK19 Mod 3 MIL-Spec First Article Acceptance Test</u></strong></p>



<p><em>(SADJ covered many of these items in the first article in this series, it is online at </em><a href="https://sadefensejournal.com/mk19-mod-3-us-ordnance-runs-the-gauntlet/"><em>www.sadefensejournal.com</em></a><em>, if you would like to refer to it).</em></p>



<p><strong>Spoiler Alert: U.S. Ordnance’s MK19 Mod 3 program has passed all of the MIL-Spec testing and is in the third phase. They are the only source of U.S.-made MK19 Mod 3 machine guns accepted by the U.S. military.</strong></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Pre-Firing Inspection</strong> There are 19 points to cover in this visual inspection.</li>



<li><strong>Ammunition Compatibility Check</strong> This is done with a variety of issue rounds supplied by the customer. There are 12 steps in this process, covered in our first article.</li>



<li><strong>Gun Sight and Bore Calibration Check</strong> There are 12 steps in this process, covered in this article.</li>



<li><strong>Proof Inspection </strong>This is a 3-part inspection involving firing on round of M385A1 ammunition.</li>



<li><strong>Firing Mode</strong> This is a test in 8 parts of the firing mechanism including the solenoid remote firing.</li>



<li><strong>Belt Pull</strong> A four-part test, done with free hanging 28-round belts, in two to four round bursts. We performed this test in the first article, but again throughout the second testing.</li>



<li><strong>Cycling Rate of Fire</strong> Measured with 10-round belts. Interestingly, the string of rounds is not averaged for rate of fire but measured individually to meet the required rate.</li>



<li><strong>Trunion Load </strong>Performed in the test report in this article.</li>



<li><strong>Accuracy</strong> At 1000m, a 14m target is set. Firing is done in 2-3 round bursts and all rounds must hit the target. Performed both test days we were there for.</li>



<li><strong>Post-Firing Cleaning </strong>At all times that are called for, a full inspection is done for proper cleaning and reassembly. Parts are inspected according to 9 focus points.</li>



<li><strong>Interchangeability </strong>In the first article we did, we covered some of this, but the further full testing has more of this, and a special station is set up.</li>



<li><strong>Reliability</strong> The longest part of the test, It begins with firing 192 rounds, and repeating it after rounds 152, 2304, 3456, 4608, and 5760. It is a specific cadence, intended to show any dispersion changes, or other issues.</li>



<li><strong>Full Cleaning and Inspection </strong>Specified at every 2,304 rounds. The guns are completely disassembled, visually and magnetic particle inspected, cleaned, and properly lubricated. Parts to lubricate are the bolt, barrel, firing pin cover, firing pin, bolt sear, firing pin sear, receiver, lock plate, and feed tray.</li>
</ul>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" width="1024" height="768"  alt=""  data-srcset="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/1a-3-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/1a-3-300x225.jpg 300w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/1a-3-768x576.jpg 768w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/1a-3-750x563.jpg 750w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/1a-3-1140x855.jpg 1140w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/1a-3.jpg 1200w"  data-src="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/1a-3-1024x768.jpg" data-sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" class="wp-image-89279 lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Graflex Inc, cage code IDBZ2, makes the borescope used in the bore sighting process. Model 1-1001-BR, W56HZV-05-G-005 is the model. This scope is used on the 50 BMG machine guns, as well as on the MK19 40mm guns. The lower spud is for the .50 caliber guns, the upper is for the 40mm, like the MK19. (Dan Shea)</figcaption></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img decoding="async" width="1024" height="768"  alt=""  data-srcset="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/1c-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/1c-300x225.jpg 300w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/1c-768x576.jpg 768w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/1c-750x563.jpg 750w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/1c-1140x855.jpg 1140w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/1c.jpg 1200w"  data-src="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/1c-1024x768.jpg" data-sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" class="wp-image-89282 lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The special bore sighting MK19 target is placed at the other end of the test tunnel, the fixtured MK19 has the scope inserted and zeroed in, and the sights are calibrated to match. This must be done before the firing protocol has started. (Dan Shea)</figcaption></figure>



<div class="wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-9d6595d7 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img decoding="async" width="1024" height="768"  alt=""  data-srcset="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/2--1024x768.jpg 1024w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/2--300x225.jpg 300w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/2--768x576.jpg 768w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/2--750x563.jpg 750w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/2--1140x855.jpg 1140w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/2-.jpg 1200w"  data-src="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/2--1024x768.jpg" data-sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" class="wp-image-89283 lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Measuring, markings, finish depths, examination of every part were all done, Now it’s time to put the hammer down on the gun. Again, we had firing cadences that must be followed, with parts changes and interchanges as we go. The ammunition is piled up and the guns are in the rack. (Dan Shea)</figcaption></figure>
</div>



<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="768"  alt=""  data-srcset="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/3-1-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/3-1-300x225.jpg 300w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/3-1-768x576.jpg 768w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/3-1-750x563.jpg 750w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/3-1-1140x855.jpg 1140w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/3-1.jpg 1200w"  data-src="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/3-1-1024x768.jpg" data-sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" class="wp-image-89284 lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Measuring, markings, finish depths, examination of every part were all done, Now, it’s time to put the hammer down on the gun. Again, we had firing cadences that must be followed, with parts changes and interchanges as we go. The ammunition is piled up and the guns are in the rack. (Dan Shea)</figcaption></figure>
</div>
</div>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="768"  alt=""  data-srcset="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/4-1-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/4-1-300x225.jpg 300w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/4-1-768x576.jpg 768w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/4-1-750x563.jpg 750w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/4-1-1140x855.jpg 1140w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/4-1.jpg 1200w"  data-src="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/4-1-1024x768.jpg" data-sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" class="wp-image-89285 lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">An area for disassembly, switching out parts, and reassembly is prepared. There are bins for each part, and when the test guns are disassembled, they parts go in the bins and are randomly reassembled. (Dan Shea)</figcaption></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="768"  alt=""  data-srcset="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/5-1-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/5-1-300x225.jpg 300w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/5-1-768x576.jpg 768w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/5-1-750x563.jpg 750w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/5-1-1140x855.jpg 1140w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/5-1.jpg 1200w"  data-src="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/5-1-1024x768.jpg" data-sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" class="wp-image-89286 lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">In the disassembly area, photographic guides are on the wall to detail what level disassembly must be done at this station. (Dan Shea)</figcaption></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="768"  alt=""  data-srcset="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/6-1-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/6-1-300x225.jpg 300w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/6-1-768x576.jpg 768w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/6-1-750x563.jpg 750w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/6-1-1140x855.jpg 1140w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/6-1.jpg 1200w"  data-src="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/6-1-1024x768.jpg" data-sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" class="wp-image-89287 lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Each gun is tracked in the disassembly area with this chart detailing what goes next for each MK19. (Dan Shea)</figcaption></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="768"  alt=""  data-srcset="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/7-1-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/7-1-300x225.jpg 300w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/7-1-768x576.jpg 768w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/7-1-750x563.jpg 750w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/7-1-1140x855.jpg 1140w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/7-1.jpg 1200w"  data-src="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/7-1-1024x768.jpg" data-sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" class="wp-image-89288 lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Every time a MK19 has the bolt disassembled, there are about 12-15 replaceable parts that must be replaced each time. There are nylon head screws, helical springs, plastic discs, and tie wire that must be re-tied. It’s a time-consuming process and called for in the Mil-Spec. (Dan Shea)</figcaption></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="471"  alt=""  data-srcset="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/8-1-1024x471.jpg 1024w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/8-1-300x138.jpg 300w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/8-1-768x353.jpg 768w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/8-1-750x345.jpg 750w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/8-1-1140x524.jpg 1140w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/8-1.jpg 1200w"  data-src="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/8-1-1024x471.jpg" data-sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" class="wp-image-89289 lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The basic tools of disassembly; top is the MK19 multi-tool, bottom is a specially designed prybar that operators and armorers favor for many tasks, specifically removing rounds on the bolt face. (Dan Shea)</figcaption></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="768"  alt=""  data-srcset="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/8a-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/8a-300x225.jpg 300w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/8a-768x576.jpg 768w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/8a-750x563.jpg 750w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/8a-1140x855.jpg 1140w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/8a.jpg 1200w"  data-src="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/8a-1024x768.jpg" data-sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" class="wp-image-89290 lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Fired MK19 Mod 3 on the disassembly table, ready for a stage one inspection. (Dan Shea)</figcaption></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="768"  alt=""  data-srcset="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/9-1-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/9-1-300x225.jpg 300w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/9-1-768x576.jpg 768w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/9-1-750x563.jpg 750w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/9-1-1140x855.jpg 1140w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/9-1.jpg 1200w"  data-src="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/9-1-1024x768.jpg" data-sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" class="wp-image-89291 lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Basic assemblies that will be inspected at short interval.  (Dan Shea)</figcaption></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="768"  alt=""  data-srcset="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/9a-Magna-flux-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/9a-Magna-flux-300x225.jpg 300w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/9a-Magna-flux-768x576.jpg 768w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/9a-Magna-flux-750x563.jpg 750w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/9a-Magna-flux-1140x855.jpg 1140w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/9a-Magna-flux.jpg 1200w"  data-src="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/9a-Magna-flux-1024x768.jpg" data-sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" class="wp-image-89292 lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">After the proof testing called for in 3.6, magnetic particle inspection (MPI) is performed. This is also called for all throughout the testing. Parts are sent to be tested at intervals. Generally, this is called “Magnafluxing” after the manufacturer usually associated with the process. It’s a non-destructive process, and in the case of U.S. Ordnance, they use a “wet” system which is ideal for production needs. In this wet system, a petroleum based “suspension vehicle”, basically a light oil, has a specified quantity of fluorescent magnetic particles added to it (suspended in it). The formula is pretty standard in this use; Magnaglo 14A particles in Carrier II liquid. (Dan Shea)</figcaption></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="768"  alt=""  data-srcset="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/10-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/10-300x225.jpg 300w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/10-768x576.jpg 768w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/10-750x563.jpg 750w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/10-1140x855.jpg 1140w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/10.jpg 1200w"  data-src="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/10-1024x768.jpg" data-sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" class="wp-image-89293 lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">After the top cover has been reassembled, proper lubrication is applied. One thing about MK19s, they do not like CLP. It gums them up, badly. It’s actually forbidden to use it in MK19s. LSA is called for in normal use. Most of us in the field use TW-25b, the same Teflon-based grease that we use in aerospace and M134 Miniguns. We also don’t mix lubrication. It’s TW-25b or something else. (Dan Shea)</figcaption></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="768"  alt=""  data-srcset="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/11-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/11-300x225.jpg 300w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/11-768x576.jpg 768w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/11-750x563.jpg 750w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/11-1140x855.jpg 1140w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/11.jpg 1200w"  data-src="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/11-1024x768.jpg" data-sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" class="wp-image-89294 lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Looking up inside the cover at the very bottom in this picture, a helical spring is evident. This spring must be proper for the presentation of the round to the bolt face. Each time the system is disassembled, this must be checked. (Dan Shea)</figcaption></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="768"  alt=""  data-srcset="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/12-1-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/12-1-300x225.jpg 300w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/12-1-768x576.jpg 768w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/12-1-750x563.jpg 750w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/12-1-1140x855.jpg 1140w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/12-1.jpg 1200w"  data-src="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/12-1-1024x768.jpg" data-sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" class="wp-image-89295 lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The feed adjustment tool is placed in the feed tray, as shown. It will now be visible from the ogive hole in the receiver front. (Dan Shea)</figcaption></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="768"  alt=""  data-srcset="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/13-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/13-300x225.jpg 300w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/13-768x576.jpg 768w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/13-750x563.jpg 750w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/13-1140x855.jpg 1140w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/13.jpg 1200w"  data-src="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/13-1024x768.jpg" data-sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" class="wp-image-89296 lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">With the tool in position, the bolt is retracted and held open. (Dan Shea)</figcaption></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="768"  alt=""  data-srcset="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/14-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/14-300x225.jpg 300w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/14-768x576.jpg 768w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/14-750x563.jpg 750w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/14-1140x855.jpg 1140w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/14.jpg 1200w"  data-src="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/14-1024x768.jpg" data-sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" class="wp-image-89297 lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The white lines are on each other, lined up within tolerances for proper feeding. If they do not line up, adjustments must be made. It is expected that through most of the firing these will not get out of line during disassembly. (Dan Shea)</figcaption></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="768"  alt=""  data-srcset="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/15-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/15-300x225.jpg 300w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/15-768x576.jpg 768w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/15-750x563.jpg 750w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/15-1140x855.jpg 1140w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/15.jpg 1200w"  data-src="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/15-1024x768.jpg" data-sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" class="wp-image-89298 lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">During the test, after reassembly, to cycle the MK19, four dummy rounds are placed in the feed tray, female link first.  (Dan Shea)</figcaption></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="768"  alt=""  data-srcset="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/16a-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/16a-300x225.jpg 300w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/16a-768x576.jpg 768w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/16a-750x563.jpg 750w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/16a-1140x855.jpg 1140w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/16a.jpg 1200w"  data-src="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/16a-1024x768.jpg" data-sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" class="wp-image-89299 lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">When the bolt is retracted, visual inspection should show a round on the bolt face as seen through the charging handle slot. (Dan Shea)</figcaption></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="768"  alt=""  data-srcset="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/16b-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/16b-300x225.jpg 300w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/16b-768x576.jpg 768w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/16b-750x563.jpg 750w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/16b-1140x855.jpg 1140w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/16b.jpg 1200w"  data-src="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/16b-1024x768.jpg" data-sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" class="wp-image-89300 lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Looking down through the top of the open MK19, a dummy round can see being held on the bolt face. The MK19 tool is being used to pry it downward off the bolt face through the right-hand charging slot. (Dan Shea)</figcaption></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="678"  alt=""  data-srcset="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/17a-1024x678.jpg 1024w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/17a-300x199.jpg 300w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/17a-768x508.jpg 768w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/17a-750x496.jpg 750w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/17a-1140x754.jpg 1140w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/17a.jpg 1200w"  data-src="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/17a-1024x678.jpg" data-sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" class="wp-image-89301 lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The outdoor section of live firing was done at the local range U.S. Ordnance owns. This picture is after the first can of ammo is fired. Some firing was also done from a HUMVEE mount. (Dan Shea)</figcaption></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="768"  alt=""  data-srcset="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/18-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/18-300x225.jpg 300w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/18-768x576.jpg 768w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/18-750x563.jpg 750w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/18-1140x855.jpg 1140w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/18.jpg 1200w"  data-src="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/18-1024x768.jpg" data-sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" class="wp-image-89302 lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The majority of the ammunition is fired inside a special test building that has a unique water trap for the rounds to be fired into. The water is filtered and recycled into the trap; the projectiles are automatically removed from the container with a conveyor system. The MK19 is held this high above ground, as part of the belt pull protocols calling for 28 hanging rounds in the test. Belt pull strength is constantly monitored to see if there is any degradation. (Dan Shea)</figcaption></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="768"  alt=""  data-srcset="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/19-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/19-300x225.jpg 300w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/19-768x576.jpg 768w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/19-750x563.jpg 750w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/19-1140x855.jpg 1140w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/19.jpg 1200w"  data-src="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/19-1024x768.jpg" data-sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" class="wp-image-89303 lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">A custom mount was made in-house by U.S. Ordnance, and it allows the use of the electric firing solenoid system, which is designed to make the cadence of firing easier to perform. (Dan Shea)</figcaption></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="768"  alt=""  data-srcset="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/20-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/20-300x225.jpg 300w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/20-768x576.jpg 768w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/20-750x563.jpg 750w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/20-1140x855.jpg 1140w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/20.jpg 1200w"  data-src="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/20-1024x768.jpg" data-sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" class="wp-image-89304 lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">A better view of the custom firing platform. (Dan Shea)</figcaption></figure>



<div class="wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-9d6595d7 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="768"  alt=""  data-srcset="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/21-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/21-300x225.jpg 300w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/21-768x576.jpg 768w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/21-750x563.jpg 750w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/21-1140x855.jpg 1140w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/21.jpg 1200w"  data-src="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/21-1024x768.jpg" data-sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" class="wp-image-89305 lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The mount shown here is a special mount custom made to the government specification for the test. (Dan Shea)</figcaption></figure>
</div>



<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="768"  alt=""  data-srcset="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/22-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/22-300x225.jpg 300w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/22-768x576.jpg 768w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/22-750x563.jpg 750w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/22-1140x855.jpg 1140w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/22.jpg 1200w"  data-src="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/22-1024x768.jpg" data-sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" class="wp-image-89306 lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">The Kistler Force meter is a very expensive and sensitive piece of equipment, yet it is built to handle the recoil forces of larger forces than will be in this test. (Dan Shea)</figcaption></figure>
</div>
</div>



<p>In Section 4.5.8 “Trunnion Load”</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><em>A. For First Article Inspection, this test shall be performed concurrently with the belt pull test.</em></li>



<li><em>B. Mount a Quartz Force Link Cell Kistler Model 9362 with a Charge Amplifier Model 504E and a Filter Model 545A (Or Equivalent) directly below the receiver, below the locking pin, integral with the mount and in alignment with the receiver buffers.</em></li>



<li><em>C. Record a time-load trace of recoil using a Honeywell Visicorder Modl 1858 with a TCD (tape compatible differential) Amplifier Model 1887, or approved alternate equipment.</em></li>



<li><em>D. Trunion load forces are to be measured at the mounting point. The last three (3) rounds of the belt fired shall be discounted.</em></li>
</ul>



<p>The mount shown here is a special mount custom made to the government specification for the test. The Kistler Force meter is a very expensive and sensitive piece of equipment, yet it is built to handle the recoil forces of larger forces than will be in this test. The reason for testing during the belt-pull test are based on finding variations in the side weight of the belt, and as the belt lightens the forces will change. This data will be valuable to see the consistency of the construction. After this first article test, the trunnion load tests will be less frequent but based purely on the single rounds fired. </p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="765"  alt=""  data-srcset="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/23-1024x765.jpg 1024w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/23-300x224.jpg 300w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/23-768x573.jpg 768w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/23-750x560.jpg 750w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/23-1140x851.jpg 1140w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/23.jpg 1200w"  data-src="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/23-1024x765.jpg" data-sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" class="wp-image-89307 lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">At various times in the process, sectioning of barrels is called for, in order to judge throat, bore, and muzzle erosion. Gauges are used for most of this, but thin slices must be made in order to measure the rifling depth, as well as chrome depth. The barrel grooves must be checked for height all through samples of the production barrels. Here, an extremely thin shim (0.030-0.040in.) is cut cross-sectionally from the middle of the barrel and the consistency and depth of grooves related to lands are checked, as well as the finish depth. The chrome should be 0.002in. thick. Obviously, these are destructive tests and done on random barrels during the specification match testing. (Dan Shea)</figcaption></figure>



<div class="wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-9d6595d7 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="768"  alt=""  data-srcset="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/24a-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/24a-300x225.jpg 300w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/24a-768x576.jpg 768w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/24a-750x563.jpg 750w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/24a-1140x855.jpg 1140w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/24a.jpg 1200w"  data-src="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/24a-1024x768.jpg" data-sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" class="wp-image-89308 lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">After test-cycling the MK19 with dummy rounds, this is what they look like. (Dan Shea)</figcaption></figure>
</div>



<div class="wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow">
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="768"  alt=""  data-srcset="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/24b-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/24b-300x225.jpg 300w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/24b-768x576.jpg 768w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/24b-750x563.jpg 750w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/24b-1140x855.jpg 1140w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/24b.jpg 1200w"  data-src="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/24b-1024x768.jpg" data-sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" class="wp-image-89309 lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Note that the links are de-linked and pushed to the rear. In this closeup, the male and female end of the links are evident. (Dan Shea)</figcaption></figure>
</div>
</div>



<p>After test-cycling the MK19 with dummy rounds, this is what they look like. Note that the links are de-linked and pushed to the rear. In the closeup, the male and female end of the links are evident.</p>



<p>The male end must be pulled out of the female, to the rear. Thus, when a can of ammunition is first opened, the first round will present with a female end of the link to feed into the feed tray. On cocking, the round is pulled to the rear, then slammed forward into the barrel, pushing the single link rearward on the body of the casing, and ejecting it. When fed into the HK GMG machine gun, because it pushes through forward, the belt must be presented opposite, with the male link into the feed first. This requires taking the belts out of the can before using and reversing the belt.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="768"  alt=""  data-srcset="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/25a-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/25a-300x225.jpg 300w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/25a-768x576.jpg 768w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/25a-750x563.jpg 750w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/25a-1140x855.jpg 1140w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/25a.jpg 1200w"  data-src="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/25a-1024x768.jpg" data-sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" class="wp-image-89310 lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">In U.S. Ordnance’s instructor classroom, they’ve made a custom factory cutaway of the MK19 Mod 3 as a training aid. We are curious if these will be available for contract sales. (Dan Shea)</figcaption></figure>



<p>In U.S. Ordnance’s instructor classroom, they’ve made a custom factory cutaway of the MK19 Mod 3 as a training aid. We are curious if these will be available for contract sales.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="768"  alt=""  data-srcset="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/25b-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/25b-300x225.jpg 300w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/25b-768x576.jpg 768w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/25b-750x563.jpg 750w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/25b-1140x855.jpg 1140w, https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/25b.jpg 1200w"  data-src="https://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/25b-1024x768.jpg" data-sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" class="wp-image-89311 lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">U.S. Ordnance’s custom factory cutaway of the MK19 Mod 3 as a training aid. (Dan Shea)</figcaption></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>PLA Infantry Weapons: Small Arms of the World&#8217;s Largest Army</title>
		<link>https://sadefensejournal.com/pla-infantry-weapons-small-arms-of-the-worlds-largest-army/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gordon Arthur]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 19:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Author Name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry Profiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search By Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V6N2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automatic grenade launcher (AGL)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gordon Arthur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People’s Armed Police (PAP)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People’s Liberation Army (PLA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QBU88]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QBZ95]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QCQ05]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QCW05]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QJY88]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QJZ89]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QLT89]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QLZ87]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QSL92]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadefensejournal.com/wp/?p=2649</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ABOVE: These company-level PF98 120mm rocket launchers have just a basic optical sight system. Note the basic tripod dropped to its lowest position. In a previous article published in SADJ, we examined the QBZ95 (Type 95) assault rifle used by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) in China.  In this issue we expand our remit to [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>ABOVE: These company-level PF98 120mm rocket launchers have just a basic optical sight system.  Note the basic tripod dropped to its lowest position.</em></p>
<p>In a <a href="http://sadefensejournal.com/wp/?p=2135">previous article published in <i>SADJ</i>,</a> we examined the QBZ95 (Type 95) assault rifle used by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) in China.  In this issue we expand our remit to look at a wider range of standard small arms used by infantry units in China’s enormous military.  As before, the photos and much of the technical data derive from the Hong Kong Garrison of the PLA.</p>
<p>The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) returned to China’s bosom on 1 July 1997.  The HK Garrison is a force of carefully selected PLA personnel; somewhere between 4,000 and 5,000 soldiers strong.  Strategically, it may not be a large garrison for the PLA, but it does represent a politically symbolic force for the Chinese government.  Thus, the force is often among the vanguard to field new weapon systems.</p>
<p>We will examine a total of nine different weapons operated by the HK Garrison, and of course these are representative of what are used by the wider PLA.  The weapons have been arranged in general order of size.  We would also point out that the nomenclature used here is that favored by the PLA itself.  Whereas many Western sources add hyphens in weapon designations, the PLA does not do so (e.g. QLZ87 rather than QLZ-87).</p>
<p></p>
<div class="img " style="width:100%px;">
	<a><img decoding="async"  alt="" width="100%" data-src="http://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/qsl92.jpg" class="lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /></a></p>
<div>A QSL92 pistol in 5.56mm caliber belonging to the Hong Kong Garrison of the PLA.  Note the ambidextrous safety/decocking lever that is mounted on both sides of the handgun.</div>
</div>
<p><b>QSZ92 Pistol</b><br />
The QSZ92, a product of Norinco, has been the standard semiautomatic pistol used by the PLA since it was introduced in the late 1990s.  It is believed development commenced around 1994.  Of conventional design with some idiosyncrasies, it can be chambered in either 9x19mm Parabellum or 5.8x21mm caliber (referred to as the QSZ92-9 and QSZ92-5.8 respectively).  The frame is made of polymer and it is recoil-operated and has a locked breech.  The barrel rotates upon recoil to lock and unlock itself from the slide using two rows of split locking lugs.</p>
<p>A total of 15 9mm rounds, or 20 rounds of 5.8mm ammunition, are dual-stacked in the magazine.  The pistol employs a double-action trigger mechanism and a three-dot fixed sight.  A laser light or flashlight can be fitted on an integral rail underneath the barrel.</p>
<p>The PLA’s preferred caliber for soldiers (e.g. special forces) is 9mm, while commanders and officers are issued the 5.8mm-caliber version.  The handgun is also commonly used by police forces in China.  The QSZ92 has been adopted by the militaries of Bangladesh and Cambodia.</p>
<p><b>Weight:</b>760 g<br />
<b>Length:</b>190 mm<br />
<b>Barrel length:</b>111 mm<br />
<b>Magazine:</b>15 rounds (for 9mm)<br />
<b>Muzzle velocity:</b>350 m/s<br />
<b>Effective range:</b>50 m</p>
<p></p>
<div class="img " style="width:100%px;">
	<a><img decoding="async"  alt="" width="100%" data-src="http://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/qcw05.jpg" class="lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /></a></p>
<div>The PLA’s 5.8mm QCW05 submachine gun is easily identified by the carry handle, whereas the JS has a Picatinny rail fitted instead.  Note the silencer that is here attached to the barrel.</div>
</div>
<p><b>QCW05 5.8mm Submachine Gun</b><br />
The QCW05 (its name Weisheng Chongfeng Qiang literally means ‘Silenced Assault Gun’) is a 5.8x21mm-caliber submachine gun that joined PLA service after winning a competition to replace Type 79 and 85 silenced submachine guns in 2001.  Although it bears some familial resemblance to the standard QBZ95 assault rifle, it was jointly developed by the 208 Research Institute and Jianshe Industries (Group) Corporation in Chongqing.  The latter is part of China South Industries Group, and the QCW05 was officially unveiled at the International Police Equipment Expo in Beijing in 2005.</p>
<p>The QCW05 of bullpup configuration operates on the blowback principle, firing from an open bolt.  It is said to possess easy construction characteristics, and polymers are used for elements such as the shoulder stock and pistol grip.  The weapon can fire in single, 3-round-burst or fully automatic modes.  The gun is fed from a four-row box magazine that holds 50 rounds.  Like the Type 95 rifle, spent cases eject only from the right side, meaning it is not advisable to fire left-handed.  It has a deliberately low rate of fire to aid controllability.  It has a flip-up rear sight.</p>
<p>The PLA fires 5.8x21mm cartridges with the QCW05, and it is typically issued to non-combat personnel such as vehicle crews and aircrews.  Its compact size makes it easy to use in cramped environments like vehicle interiors.  Of course, it is also intended for Special Forces use, hence the detachable silencer that can be fitted.  The 5.8x21mm DCV05 subsonic round is available when the silencer is employed.</p>
<p>When chambered in 9mm caliber, it is known as the JS, and it is commonly used by the People’s Armed Police (PAP).  The JS has a lower-capacity 30-round magazine owing to the larger 9mm rounds.  The QCQ05 is a version without a suppressor.</p>
<p><b>Weight:</b>2.2 kg<br />
<b>Length:</b>500 mm<br />
<b>Barrel length:</b>250 mm<br />
<b>Magazine:</b>50 rounds<br />
<b>Muzzle velocity:</b>150 m/s (w/ silencer)<br />
<b>Effective range:</b>50 m (silencer fitted)</p>
<p></p>
<div class="img " style="width:100%px;">
	<a><img decoding="async"  alt="" width="100%" data-src="http://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/qbu88.jpg" class="lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /></a></p>
<div>A QBU88 sniper rifle seen with its bipod and 4x telescopic sight attached.  It offers a longer range than the standard QBZ95 assault rifle.  It has adjustable iron sights fitted as standard.</div>
</div>
<p><b>QBU88 5.8mm Sniper Rifle</b><br />
The QBU88 (or Type 88) is more of a designated marksman rifle than a true sniper rifle, and it is perfectly capable of providing aimed semiautomatic fire at longer ranges.  This is a significant weapon since it was the first of a new generation of Chinese weapons to use the proprietary 5.8x42mm caliber.  As indicated by its Type 88 designation, it was adopted by the PLA sometime in the late 1980s or thereafter.</p>
<p>The gas-operated QBU88 fires a heavier 5.8x42mm round, although it can still shoot the regular 5.8mm cartridge used with the Type 95 assault rifle.  The short-stroke gas piston is located above the barrel, and it utilizes a three-lug rotating bolt.  Diopter-type adjustable iron sights are standard, but typically it is fitted with a 4x magnification scope.  A night sight is also available, which can be fitted on a short rail.</p>
<p>This weapon is used by both the PLA and police in China.  Generally it is used in conjunction with a detachable bipod.</p>
<p><b>Weight:</b>4.2 kg<br />
<b>Length:</b>920 mm<br />
<b>Barrel length:</b>620 mm<br />
<b>Magazine:</b>10 rounds<br />
<b>Effective range:</b>800 m</p>
<p></p>
<div class="img " style="width:100%px;">
	<a><img decoding="async"  alt="" width="100%" data-src="http://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/qjy88.jpg" class="lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /></a></p>
<div>This QJY88 general-purpose machine gun is mounted on a tripod for sustained fire.  It can alternatively be operated with just a bipod for the light machine gun role.</div>
</div>
<p><b>QJY88 5.8mm Machine Gun</b><br />
The Type 88 is a 5.8x42mm general-purpose machine gun that replaced the incumbent Type 67.  It has an integral bipod or it can be mounted on a lightweight tripod for sustained fire.  A standard crew in such a role comprises two soldiers.</p>
<p>Despite its name incorporating the digits 88, it seems the weapon only entered PLA service earlier this millennium.  This light machine gun from the Norinco stable is reportedly not so popular among troops because it lacks the range and lethality of its predecessor.  Although lighter than the Type 67 machine gun, it is still considerably heavier than foreign counterparts such as the FN Minimi.</p>
<p>The QJY88 is air-cooled and gas-operated with a long-stroke gas piston, and the barrel can be quickly detached.  The weapon is fed from a 200-round disintegrating steel belt contained in a plastic box mounted on the left.  The standard round is 5.8x42mm.</p>
<p><b>Weight:</b>11.8 kg (16 kg w/ tripod)<br />
<b>Length:</b>1,160 mm<br />
<b>Barrel length:</b>600 mm<br />
<b>Magazine:</b>200 rounds<br />
<b>Muzzle velocity:</b>895 m/s<br />
<b>Effective range:</b>800 m</p>
<p></p>
<div class="img " style="width:100%px;">
	<a><img decoding="async"  alt="" width="100%" data-src="http://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/qjz89.jpg" class="lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /></a></p>
<div>A QJZ89 heavy machine gun on display at the PLA’s Stonecutters Island Naval Base in Hong Kong.  It is mounted on an adjustable-height tripod and an optical sight is fitted.</div>
</div>
<p><b>QJZ89 12.7mm Heavy Machine Gun</b><br />
The QJZ89 is the Chinese equivalent of the M2 .50 cal. machine gun commonly used in the West.  This crew-served weapon offers sustained fire support for ground troops and it can also be mounted on light vehicles (the Dongfeng EQ2050 4&#215;4, for example).  As well as attacking lightly protected targets and lightly armored vehicles, it could be used in the antiaircraft role too.  A standard weapon crew is three men, and it is fielded at both the battalion and company levels within the PLA.</p>
<p>The air-cooled Type 89 uses a gas-/recoil-operated action.  The machine gun is typically mounted on a tripod and the QJZ89 is fed from a 50-round belt contained in a box mounted on the left.  The detachable barrel can be quickly changed, while the muzzle brake is particularly large.  Its first public appearance was with the Hong Kong Garrison in 1997.</p>
<p>This heavy machine gun usually features an optical sight for improved long-range accuracy, but a night vision sight can also be mounted.  Its rate of fire is 450-600 rounds per minute, and it fires a 12.7x108mm round (armor-piercing, high explosive and incendiary are available).  The gunner operates the weapon by holding a pistol grip with rifle-type trigger, supported by a tubular shoulder stock.</p>
<p><b>Weight:</b>17.5 kg (26 kg w/ tripod)<br />
<b>Length:</b>1,920 mm<br />
<b>Barrel length:</b>1,002 mm<br />
<b>Magazine:</b>50 rounds<br />
<b>Muzzle velocity:</b>825 m/s<br />
<b>Effective range:</b>1,500 m</p>
<p></p>
<div class="img " style="width:100%px;">
	<a><img decoding="async"  alt="" width="100%" data-src="http://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/qlz87.jpg" class="lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /></a></p>
<div>A QLZ87 35mm automatic grenade launcher displayed with an optical sight and rubber shoulder pad.  Note the fitted 15-round drum magazine, and the smaller 6-round drum alongside.</div>
</div>
<p><b>QLZ87 35mm Automatic </b><b>Grenade Launcher</b><br />
This automatic grenade launcher (AGL) of 35mm caliber was developed by Norinco in the late 1980s, building upon studies of the Russian AGS-17 and development of the W87 export type.  Issued in the mid-1990s, it is notable for being the first such weapon to enter PLA service as standard issue.  It is issued at the platoon and company level to give direct fire support to infantry.</p>
<p>Great effort was invested into making the weapon as light as possible, which explains why a locked-breech action was chosen.  The QLZ87 can be operated in two ways: as a standard 12 kg type with bipod fired by a single soldier and with a range of 600 m; or a 20 kg tripod-mounted heavy version served by three crewmen and with a 1,750 m maximum range.  The tripod allows 360º traverse and an elevation range from -10º to 70º, which thus gives it a theoretical capability against low-flying aircraft.  It is gas-operated (direct impingement) and air-cooled.  A 3x optical sight is fitted as standard.  The QLZ87 can also be fitted on vehicles and helicopters to give them a degree of firepower.</p>
<p>The AGL fires a range of 35x32mm rounds, including high explosive (HE), high explosive anti-tank (HEAT), incendiary and smoke grenades in either single or burst mode.  Its sustained rate of fire is 45 rounds per minute.  The grenades can be loaded in either a 6-round or 15-round drum magazine underneath the weapon instead of a more complicated belt feed.  The 35mm grenades, weighing 250 g each, have a better blast radius performance (claimed 10 m kill radius) and armor penetration capacity (up to 80 mm) than 40mm grenades of the American Mk 19 AGL.</p>
<p>An unusual feature is the position of the pistol grip that extends laterally from the right side alongside the trigger and safety/fire selector.  Its rate of fire, especially when using the light version, must make accurate shooting difficult.  Another problem is the very low drum magazine capacity.  The PLA obviously opted for maneuverability instead of firepower with this AGL.  As the first generation adopted by the PLA, the QLZ87 apparently had some teething problems, and this would explain why the belt-fed QLZ04 AGL was later fielded.</p>
<p><b>Weight:</b>20 kg (heavy variant)<br />
<b>Length:</b>970 mm<br />
<b>Magazine:</b>6 or 15 rounds<br />
<b>Muzzle velocity:</b>200 m/s<br />
<b>Effective range:</b>1,750 m</p>
<p></p>
<div class="img " style="width:100%px;">
	<a><img decoding="async"  alt="" width="100%" data-src="http://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/qlt89.jpg" class="lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /></a></p>
<div>The QLT89 is a handheld grenade launcher that fires 50mm rounds at targets up to 800 m away.  The lightweight weapon is fired by one man and there is no bipod attached.</div>
</div>
<p><b>QLT89 50mm Grenade Launcher</b><br />
This is a handheld grenade launcher of 50mm caliber (i.e. it has no bipod), with the design being finalized in the early 1990s.  It weighs just 3.8 kg and is capable of lobbing a round out to 800 m to produce a suppressive-fire effect.  Components include the tube assembly, seat assembly, trigger assembly and strap.  A simple flip-out sight at the end of the tube helps with basic aiming.</p>
<p>The PLA highlights the QLT89’s lightness and ease of handling, as well as the fact that it does not produce smoke or flash, and makes minimal sound, when fired.  It is utilized by platoons and companies within the PLA.  The main round is a 50mm anti-personnel grenade that produces 800 fragments in a 16 m-radius kill zone. The grenade weighs 700 g and is 330 mm long. Smoke, incendiary and illumination grenades are also available for the QLT89.  An improved QLT89A has since been developed.</p>
<p><b>Weight:</b>3.8 kg<br />
<b>Length:</b>600 mm<br />
<b>Effective range:</b>800 m</p>
<p></p>
<div class="img " style="width:100%px;">
	<a><img decoding="async"  alt="" width="100%" data-src="http://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/pp87.jpg" class="lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /></a></p>
<div>A PP87 mortar viewed from the front right.  This is the standard 82mm mortar used by the PLA.  Its maximum range is 4.66 km.</div>
</div>
<p><b>PP87 82mm Mortar</b><br />
This is a larger crew-served mortar produced by Norinco.  The medium-caliber Type 87 replaced the older Type 67 and it is widely used at the battalion level.  The PP87 can fire three types of round – HE, smoke and illumination.</p>
<p><b>Weight:</b>39.7 kg<br />
<b>Length:</b>1,400 mm<br />
<b>Effective range:</b>120 m &#8211; 4,660 m</p>
<p></p>
<div class="img " style="width:100%px;">
	<a><img decoding="async"  alt="" width="100%" data-src="http://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/pf98.jpg" class="lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /></a></p>
<div>This battalion-level PF98 rocket launcher is fitted with the more substantial digital fire control unit.  The PLA weapon is here mounted on a regular tripod.</div>
</div>
<p><b>PF98 120mm Rocket Launcher</b><br />
The final weapon we are presenting is the PF98 anti-tank rocket launcher from Norinco, which succeeded outdated Type 78 and 65 recoilless rifles.  Development of this more modern anti-tank weapon commenced in the 1990s, resulting in the PF98, and it fills the gap between individual rocket launchers and more sophisticated anti-tank guided missiles (ATGM).  The PF98 fires 120mm rockets designed to destroy enemy tanks, armored vehicles, bunkers and fortifications.</p>
<p>This weapon was first seen in the Macao Garrison of the PLA in 1999, but the PLA now widely fields the rocket launcher at battalion and company levels.  It can fire either a 120mm HE multipurpose or HEAT round, with the PLA claiming an 800 mm penetration capability for the latter.  This 6.3 kg HEAT round has a tandem warhead and an electronically controlled timer fuse.  The 7.5 kg HE round, meanwhile, contains 120 steel balls and incendiary material that can pierce 400 mm of armor.</p>
<p>The PF98 exists in two versions – one with a basic fire control unit with optical sight (with night vision channel), laser rangefinder, fire control computer and LED display (referred to as the battalion-level PF98); and the other with a simpler 4x optical sight with night vision channel (known as the company-level PF98).  The former version offers a much better chance of a hit since the system makes ballistic calculations for the gunner.</p>
<p>In 2010, the Hong Kong Garrison displayed a newer version called the PF98A.  The most obvious difference is a modified fire control unit that offers enhanced accuracy and fewer buttons to press (25 keys reduced to about 12).  The sight is improved &amp; a new rocket was developed in 2006 too.  The PLA gives the PF98A’s length as 1.25 m, which reflects the altered and lighter launch tube (now approximately 7 kg in weight).</p>
<p>The one- or two-man crew can fire the PF98 from a tripod (with -6º to +30º elevation range, and 360º traverse) or from the shoulder.  Reaction time from target acquisition to firing for the original PF98 is 10 seconds, and between four and six rounds can be fired per minute.  The older fiberglass reusable tube launcher weighs approximately 10 kg.  Bangladesh, Indonesia and Zimbabwe have also acquired the PF98 system.</p>
<p><b>Weight:</b>29 kg<br />
<b>Length:</b>1,191 mm<br />
<b>Effective range:</b>800m (HEAT), 1,800m (HE)<a><img decoding="async" align="right" data-src="http://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/article_end.png" class="lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
