<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jiří Čermák &#8211; Small Arms Defense Journal</title>
	<atom:link href="https://sadefensejournal.com/tag/jiri-cermak/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://sadefensejournal.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2024 21:33:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>In Honor of a Venerable Firearm: The 60th Birthday of the 7.62mm Model 58 Submachine Gun</title>
		<link>https://sadefensejournal.com/in-honor-of-a-venerable-firearm-60th-birthday-of-the-7-62mm-model-58-submachine-gun/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Pazdera]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2020 17:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Editorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search By Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V12N4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 12]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2020]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bohuslav Novotný]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Česká zbrojovka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ČZ 522]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Pazdera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[František Koucký]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jindřich Jakubec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jiří Čermák]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Josef Koucký]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karel Vystrčil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Model 58]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Model 58 P]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Model 58 Pi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Model 58 V]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samopal vz. 58]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uherský Brod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Václav Holek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZB 530]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ZK 503]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadefensejournal.com/wp/?p=83065</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Czech assault rifle officially named “7.62mm Samopal vz. 58” (7.62mm model 58 submachine gun) has recently celebrated 60 years since its introduction in duty. This alternative to the Soviet Kalashnikov automatic rifle with original design is still widely popular, which is evidenced by its renewed production 15 years ago. The vz. 58’s remarkable anniversary [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The Czech assault rifle officially named “7.62mm Samopal vz. 58” (7.62mm model 58 submachine gun) has recently celebrated 60 years since its introduction in duty. This alternative to the Soviet Kalashnikov automatic rifle with original design is still widely popular, which is evidenced by its renewed production 15 years ago. The vz. 58’s remarkable anniversary presents a good opportunity for readers to learn its story.</em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p>Since the early 1950s, development was on the way in Czechoslovakia of a new type of automatic firearm for the 7.62x45mm cartridge (Z-50, Model 52), which was created by a partial modification of the original Czech calibre 7.5x45mm with an aim to at least nominally unify the equipment with the Soviet Army. According to the knowledge gained from World War II, it was relatively successful ammunition of medium ballistic performance, ranking somewhere between classical rifle and pistol cartridges. However, it was especially suitable for light machine guns and, with some reservations, for self-loading rifles. Nevertheless, the ammunition was far from ideal for a military service firearm with the possibility of burst-mode firing.</p>
<figure id="attachment_83067" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-83067" style="width: 1024px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async"   alt="" width="1024" height="668" data-src="https://dev.sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/3594_2.jpg" class="wp-image-83067 size-full lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-83067" class="wp-caption-text"><strong>CENTRAL MILITARY ARCHIVE PRAGUE</strong><br /><em>A prototype of the ČZ 522 “heavy submachine gun” by the designer Jiří Čermák during tests in 1954. Although this model was later abandoned, its creator received a new opportunity a year later, of which he made full use.</em></figcaption></figure>
<p>It had been one of the reasons why the 4-year-long development efforts did not result in accepting any of the submitted models and there were a few. This project was one of the last ones in Czechoslovakia done by means of competition between several designers or design teams. The best designers in the industry took part in the competition: the legendary creator of Zbrojovka Brno’s light and heavy machine guns, Václav Holek, with the ZB 530 prototype; the elite representatives of the Interwar Generation of designers, Josef and František Koucký (the ZK 503, ZK 503/1 and ZK 503/2 prototypes); and young and extraordinarily talented Jiří Čermák (ČZ 515 and ČZ 522) from Česká zbrojovka in Strakonice. However, all these designers were only clarifying with the military administration what to expect from the new type of firearm and how to reach the desired goal.</p>
<figure id="attachment_83068" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-83068" style="width: 729px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img decoding="async"   alt="" width="729" height="768" data-src="https://dev.sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/3594_4.jpg" class="wp-image-83068 size-full lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-83068" class="wp-caption-text"><em>The main inventor of the model 58 submachine gun, Jiří Čermák (1926–2006).</em></figcaption></figure>
<p><strong>New Ammunition</strong></p>
<p>After state tests of the so-called “heavy submachine guns” in the summer of 1954, just the ZK 503 and ZB 530 prototypes reached the final phase; they were supposed to be developed further in the national company Konstrukta Brno. This company had become a new centralized workplace for research and development of military weapons, where experts from all of Czechoslovakia were gradually transferred.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, events took a sudden turn in 1955. The Warsaw Treaty was signed in mid-May, and it was followed by efforts for unification of military equipment in the entire Eastern Bloc. Leadership of the Communist Party of Czechoslovakia wanted to deal with the situation by introducing the production of Soviet weapons; but in autumn 1955, apparently for economic reasons, priority was given to development of domestic weapons using Soviet ammunition. While the obsolete 7.62x54R cartridge with a case bottom rim designed for machine guns was not a particular win, the excellent 7.62x39mm cartridge (Model 43) opened interesting opportunities for designers.</p>
<p>Therefore, the development of “heavy submachine guns” was definitively abandoned by the end of 1955, and new requirements were specified for a military service firearm, which, due to its difficult classification in the then existing categories, started to be called “submachine gun–rifle.” (Finally, the Czechoslovak military administration simplified the matter by applying the name, <em>submachine gun,</em> on all military service firearms able to fire in the burst mode, regardless of their calibre.)</p>
<p>The transition to the new calibre was accompanied by specification of very strict parameters: The weight of the firearm without a magazine was to be 2,700g; the total length was not to exceed 850mm; versions with fixed and folding stocks were to be made; the magazine capacity was to be 30 cartridges; and the service life of main components was to be 15,000 rounds. Designers’ work was partly facilitated by the fact that they were already allowed to use alloy steels, which had originally been rejected by the military administration, based on experience in failures from war production. There was no other way to accomplish the objective, considering such demanding requirements.</p>
<p><strong>The Broom</strong></p>
<p>The development of the new firearm was launched under the cover name “Broom” in 1956 in the national company Konstrukta Brno. Jiří Čermák (1926–2006), who had not succeeded in the previous competition for “heavy submachine guns” but had already managed to gain the reputation of being an excellent expert, became the head of the development project. What is more, he was, in fact, the only employee of Konstrukta Brno who had enough experience with firearms of similar character. His previous competitor and then shortly his colleague Václav Holek died in December 1954 at the age of 68, and the Koucký brothers, although still showing creativity and invention, refused to move from Prague to Brno and, subsequently, were not allowed to work on secret military projects any more.</p>
<p>Jiří Čermák was assisted in this project namely by Ing. Bohuslav Novotný, Karel Vystrčil and Jindřich Jakubec. It was obvious from the very first drawings that a highly modern, universal, military service firearm was about to be born in Brno. This was evidenced by the first of four patents protecting the new design (the fifth patent applied to the silencer designed for the less frequent Pi version designed for use with night-vision equipment): Jiří Čermák came out with an original design of the breech mechanism with a carried swinging breech locking piece with symmetrical locking lugs fitting in a recess in the receiver. The advantages of this design included:</p>
<ul>
<li>Locking near the cartridge chamber (making the locking rigid, with minimum elasticity);</li>
<li>General simplicity of the breech mechanism (it consisted just of a breech block carrier, breech block and breech locking piece);</li>
<li>The symmetrical locking surfaces of the breech locking piece had a positive effect on the firearm accuracy;</li>
<li>General design of the breech locking piece, in which there was, among other things, no risk of any interference, and the mass of which was relatively low compared to locking components of other systems; and</li>
<li>Simple production without any sophisticated machining operations.</li>
</ul>
<p>The development, during which the prototypes underwent several tests in the Soviet Union (the first of them was conducted as early as in autumn 1956), was officially completed in June 1958. The resulting firearm operated on the principle of locked breech with extraction of gases on a piston. The breech mechanism was locked by the separate breech locking piece. The firing mechanism had a linear hammer and a free-floating firing pin mounted in the breech block. The breech block was not connected with the piston, which enabled loading the magazine with the bolt locked in its rear position from cartridge strips (containing 10 rounds) that had remained from the previously prepared but finally unimplemented license production of the Soviet SKS self-loading rifle. The front sight base enabled the attachment of a bayonet or folding bipod, which later became characteristic for one of the three basic versions of the firearm.</p>
<p><strong>A Difficult Program</strong></p>
<p>In October 1957 a decision was made that production of the new automatic firearms would be done  by the arms factory in Uherský Brod (now Česká zbrojovka a.s., or CZ), which was definitively becoming the new main supplier of infantry equipment (with the exception of machine guns) for national armed forces.</p>
<figure id="attachment_83069" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-83069" style="width: 922px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img decoding="async"   alt="" width="922" height="768" data-src="https://dev.sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/3594_5.jpg" class="wp-image-83069 size-full lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-83069" class="wp-caption-text"><strong>MORAVIAN TERRITORIAL ARCHIVE BRNO</strong>  <em>A shot from tests in 1957.</em></figcaption></figure>
<p>Preparation for production started in the spring of 1958, and its first stage was seriously complicated by an extensive investigation of self-initiation of cartridges from license production in Vlašim. In the summer of 1958, five factory prototypes were made to verify the precision and alignment of dimensions as well as the suitability of specified production materials. The basic preparation for production was completed by September 1958, and it was followed by improvements in the firearm design based on the experience gained so far: The changes involved, for example, the bayonet holder, the bayonet release button, the trigger bar or the fire-mode selector spring. Based on a requirement by the Ministry of National Defence, tests of the modified trigger bar were conducted, which required implementing the changes on 14,000 already manufactured parts.</p>
<figure id="attachment_83070" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-83070" style="width: 1024px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async"   alt="" width="1024" height="371" data-src="https://dev.sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/3594_3.jpg" class="wp-image-83070 size-full lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-83070" class="wp-caption-text"><em>A preliminary project of the future model 58 submachine gun.</em></figcaption></figure>
<p>Hard chromium plating of long openings (barrel bore) was used in production of the new firearm—this method had been used by the company for the first time for model 52/57 self-loading rifles using the same cartridge. Chromium plating was also used for surface treatment of extremely stressed parts of the breech.</p>
<p>Considering the planned high-production volumes, the lost-wax casting technique was used for a number of parts. As the company had not fully mastered this production process yet, at the beginning, it had to establish contacts with the more experienced machinery company Kdyňské strojírny in Kdyně. Cooperation with this company was not without problems, but its unquestionable benefit was that it accelerated full implementation of the precision casting technology for Uherský Brod.</p>
<p>The plant in Uherský Brod received a preliminary approval to start the serial production of the “Broom” program from its superior departmental company Závody Říjnové revoluce Vsetín on January 29, 1959, based on a so-called “exemption from technological discipline.” Since the military administration insisted upon the earliest start of supply possible, production began before the completion of the test series and its tests, from which other partial changes in the design and in the production documentation were reasonably expected.</p>
<p>Despite the year in the official name of the firearm “7.62mm submachine gun model 58,” it was introduced in the Czechoslovak People’s Army’s equipment on February 10, 1959 via command of the Minister of National Defence Bohumír Lomský. It was followed by the Ruling of the Government of the Czechoslovak Republic No. 1106, December 23, 1959. The new firearm was officially presented to the public at the traditional military parade at the Letná Plain in Prague on May 1, 1960.</p>
<figure id="attachment_83071" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-83071" style="width: 1024px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async"   alt="" width="1024" height="632" data-src="https://dev.sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/3594_11.jpg" class="wp-image-83071 size-full lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-83071" class="wp-caption-text"><em>Almost like at the start of serial production, the CSA Brownells exclusive “Classic” model 58 rifle (brownells.com).</em></figcaption></figure>
<p><strong>Three Versions, Two Periods of Production</strong></p>
<p>Three basic models were introduced, differing in only a few details. The basic model with a fixed stock was called <strong>model 58 P</strong> (infantry); the <strong>model 58 V</strong> with folding stock was produced primarily for airborne units. In addition to these two models, the <strong>model 58 Pi</strong> was created by additional modifications and designed for use with the NSP-2 infrascope. This model was supplemented with a mounting rail, a flash hider and a bipod.</p>
<p>The first period of the model 58 submachine gun’s production—the users of which included the Czechoslovak Army and other Czechoslovak Armed Forces—spanned between 1959 and 1964, during which the arms factory in Uherský Brod produced a total of 397,034 pieces, most of which (257,987) were with the fixed stock. The plant also made 6,000 components kits for conversion to the Pi version of the firearm.</p>
<p>The second period of production fell between 1968 and 1984, when more than a half million pieces of both models (plus a small number in the Pi version again) were produced. This time, a larger part of this quantity was imported abroad, including some truly hot locations.</p>
<figure id="attachment_83072" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-83072" style="width: 974px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async"   alt="" width="974" height="768" data-src="https://dev.sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/3594_9.jpg" class="wp-image-83072 size-full lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-83072" class="wp-caption-text">The least numerous version of model 58 Pi, in this case made via modification of a piece with the original beechwood stock. (The example is from the study collection of the Beareka company.)</figcaption></figure>
<p>In addition to completed firearms, huge quantities of spare parts and bayonets were produced in Uherský Brod.</p>
<p>The most significant modification to the model 58 submachine guns during production was a change in the stock material. Beechwood was used in the first year of production. However, with respect to the high production volumes, the use of alternative, cheaper materials started to be considered already in autumn 1958. The alternatives under consideration included glass fibre but the greatest attention was paid to pressing of wooden parts, which had originally been prepared in 1957 for the finally cancelled license production of SKS rifles. The production procedure, involving pressing of wood-chip matter filled with phenol-formaldehyde resin, was finalized in 1959 by the Brno development plant in cooperation with the state Forest Products Research Institute in Bratislava. Production was assigned to the Slovak factory Bučina Zvolen, which started to supply stocks, forestocks, forearms and pistol grips made of the so-called wood-chip material in February 1962. From then on, the plant in Uherský Brod fitted the model 58 submachine guns exclusively with these parts.</p>
<p>There were many more design and technology modifications during the serial production in the years 1959 to 1984, but most of them are not always apparent at first sight. Let us mention at least reinforcing the piston shaft, modification of the trigger guard and magazine release shape, reinforcing the breech locking piece, changes in material and design of the firing pin and hammer or the folding stock’s modified design.</p>
<p>Versions in calibres 7.62x51mm NATO and .223 Remington (5.56x45mm) were created for export, but they were not introduced in production at that time. The possibility of selling a license for the basic version of the 58 abroad was considered several times, but always came to nothing, and the arms factory in Uherský Brod, hidden under the well-known military code “she,” remained the only producer of the original model 58 submachine guns.</p>
<p><strong>Action V</strong></p>
<p>Important foreign customers for model 58 submachine guns included the Democratic Republic of Vietnam (DRV) when it was actually at war with the U.S. It is said that the North Vietnamese valued the 58s highly because they were significantly lighter than the Soviet Kalashnikov rifles.</p>
<p>The supplies of Czechoslovak arms to the DRV had the form of free material aid. The first 1,300 model 58 submachine guns were exported in 1965. Another 10,000 pieces followed in 1969 and 8,000 pieces the following year. In the first half of the 1970s, the 58s were supplied to Vietnam at the volumes of 12,000–15,000 pieces a year.</p>
<p>The production for DRV was called “Action V” in the Uherský Brod factory, and, according to one of the contemporaries, 400 model 58 submachine guns were produced per day for this purpose at the time of its culmination.</p>
<p><strong>Still a Respected Veteran</strong></p>
<p>Although the total production volume of the model 58 submachine guns does not reach the volumes of AKs and some other renowned foreign assault rifles, almost 920,000 pieces produced is a respectable figure and a great success for the design team and the production factory. There were and still are certain minor flaws (e.g., not so durable cover of the receiver, loosening of the folding stock screw, slightly higher sensitivity to quality of ammunition compared to the AK); in addition, production of the firearm was really demanding and not always smooth. But this does not change anything about the fact that the parameters and performance of the model 58 at the time of its origin belonged to the world’s top class, and it is still considered to be one of the most successful assault rifles in calibre 7.62x39mm.</p>
<p>The model 58 submachine guns have remained in the Czech and Slovak Republics Armed Forces up to the present; although specifically in the Czech Republic they have been replaced by new CZ 805 BRENs and CZ BREN 2s since 2011. The fact is that such a long service life was not just due to the excellent properties of the 58s; in reality, the political and economic situation played a great role. Originally, a transition to a newly developed weapon system, LADA cal. 5.45x39mm or 5.56x45mm, was planned on the turn of 1980s, but it never happened, due to economic reasons. Seen in retrospection, it did not harm Czech and Slovak soldiers in any way. The utility value of the model 58 submachine guns in current conflicts is increased by successful partial modernizations, improving the ergonomics and enabling mounting of various accessories.</p>
<p><strong>Second Life</strong></p>
<p>In the meantime, the model 58s have started to live their second life, especially in the form of exclusively self-loading firearms for the civilian arms market. For example, the original manufacturer Česká zbrojovka, a.s., has had great success with its CZ 858 Tactical models, in which its subsidiary Zbrojovka Brno, s.r.o. also took part in their production.</p>
<p>Self-loading rifles derived from the model 58 submachine gun were originally made with higher or lesser use of the original firearms and spare parts from the Czech Army and police warehouses. Even though these resources were vast, they were finally exhausted, though the interest in the firearm continues. Therefore, completely new production has been launched. It is carried out by the company Czech Small Arms (CSA) in Jablůnka nad Bečvou in the northeast of the Czech Republic. New production is conducted with partial use of modern materials. The offer includes several versions with different barrel lengths and as standard it is possible to choose between the calibres 7.62x39mm and 5.56x45mm. CSA’s firearms have even found their way to TV and silver screens, where they have proven their worth, e.g., in the hands of the invincible 007.</p>
<p>It was on the occasion of the 60th anniversary of the 58 that CSA recently prepared for the Brownells distribution company a limited “Classic” series, the appearance of which reminds one of the model 58 submachine guns from the start of serial production.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The 3rd Generation: From the vz. 61 Skorpion Submachine Gun to the CZ Scorpion EVO 3 A1</title>
		<link>https://sadefensejournal.com/the-3rd-generation-from-the-vz-61-skorpion-submachine-gun-to-the-cz-scorpion-evo-3-a1/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Pazdera]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 21:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry Profiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search By Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V4N2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Česká zbrojovka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Pazdera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EVO 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ján Lučanský]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jaroslav Červík]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jiří Čermák]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miroslav Rybář]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Otakar Galaš]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skorpion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Submachine Gun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vz61]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XCZ 868 prototype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yugoslav M61j]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadefensejournal.com/wp/?p=1229</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Czech arms industry made a great impact in 20th century weaponry history with a large range of remarkable products.  Probably the most original of them all was a “special submachine gun” named the Skorpion, a successful effort for covering the gap between service pistols and traditional submachine guns chambered in pistol cartridges.  The Skorpion, in its initial, less powerful caliber, i.e. 7.65mm Browning (.32 Auto), has not met modern security unit’s requirements for some years, much less that of the armed forces; nevertheless....]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a><img decoding="async"  alt="" width="100%" data-src="https://dev.sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/evo1.jpg" class="lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /></a></p>
<p>The Czech arms industry made a great impact in 20th century weaponry history with a large range of remarkable products.  Probably the most original of them all was a “special submachine gun” named the Skorpion, a successful effort for covering the gap between service pistols and traditional submachine guns chambered in pistol cartridges.  The Skorpion, in its initial, less powerful caliber, i.e. 7.65mm Browning (.32 Auto), has not met modern security unit’s requirements for some years, much less that of the armed forces; nevertheless its position as a globally respected legend has not been changed by this in any way.  It is therefore no surprise that Česká zbrojovka a.s., the manufacturer of the Skorpion, registered the name Scorpion as a trade mark in the 1990s and that it is currently using it now for the third generation of compact automatic weapons made in the town of Uherský Brod.</p>
<p>At the beginning of the initial Skorpion development was an interest of the then Czechoslovak Ministry of Interior in “a special submachine gun for service purposes” in cal. 7.65mm Browning (.32 ACP), which would be suitable both for so called special security activities, and for unified armament of the State Security and Public Security members.</p>
<p>Let us recall that the State Security (StB) was the secret political police of then socialist Czechoslovakia and the Public Security was the Czechoslovak version of uniformed police; under “special security activities” it is again necessary to look for intelligence and counterintelligence activities.  What kind of automatic weapon could suit such different requirements?  The Czechoslovak Ministry of Interior had about it a surprisingly clear vision, which it summarized in 1958 in the following requirements:</p>
<p>&#8211; cal. 7.65mm Browning (.32 ACP),<br />
&#8211; weight 1 to 1.2 kg,<br />
&#8211; overall length with shoulder stock folded 250 mm,<br />
&#8211; overall length with shoulder stock extended 440 mm,<br />
&#8211; height with pistol grip 150 mm,<br />
&#8211; effective range of fire 100 m,<br />
&#8211; two types of magazines – one for 8 to 10 rounds, the other for 20 to 25 rounds.<br />
&#8211; besides fully automatic fire there should be provision to shoot also in single shots so “that this SMG could also fulfill the function of a pistol.”</p>
<p><a><img decoding="async"  alt="" width="100%" data-src="https://dev.sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/evo2.jpg" class="lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /></a></p>
<p>It is obvious that such a clear and original vision had to go through a comprehensive research and analysis phase, the content of which we can only guess.  An interesting detail was the caliber chosen as it is highly unusual for an automatic weapon and additionally not quite suitable due to its relatively low performance and cartridge case with protruding head rim.  From today’s perspective one wonders if the choice of the 7.65mm Browning (.32 ACP) cartridge, which is often considered to be the greatest shortcoming of Skorpion submachine gun, what the Ministry of Interior had in their explicit intentions.  This cartridge on one hand represented a standard pistol caliber of the Czechoslovak Security Forces, and on the other hand it had several features which were ideal just for “special security activities.”  And just for this reason even the Czech Army did not mind it – but more about this later.</p>
<p><strong>Task for Mr. Miroslav Rybá et al</strong><br />
In the first half of the 1950s within the centralization of the nationalized industry in Czechoslovakia came the end of the famous independent design offices of individual arms factories.  Instead, the Communist Party of Czechoslovakia decided to build a large specialized research and development centre, which was initially named Konstrukta Brno (after its place of residence in the City of Brno) and by the end of 1955 the elite of the Czechoslovak design engineers concentrated there dealt with military weapons and ammunition up to 30mm and anti-tank recoilless weaponry.  (Concurrently there was formed a small design centre in Prague specializing in the development of civilian firearms.  This centre however lost its independence quite quickly.)</p>
<p>New strict rules on confidentiality have been put into force for contracting weapon development and, besides other things, it has been out of question that the Ministry of Interior itself would address relevant design centre.  The application should first have to be submitted to the Czechoslovak Ministry of National Defence (MND), and in the case of the future Skorpion submachine gun this happened in the fall of 1958.  Relevant experts from MND found this idea of their colleagues from the Interior very interesting and the decision had been made that after production commenced, the purchases would also be by the Czechoslovak Peoples Army.  For the start, military personnel claimed only a small number of units for their intelligence units, however right in the beginning they came with important comments, observations and requirements, which had a substantial influence on the final version of the Skorpion.</p>
<p>The requirement of the Ministry of National Defence to produce a “special submachine gun” (among soldiers also known as “multi-purpose”) was sent to the Brno firearms research and development centre at the time when the engineers on the site were swamped with work.  All the senior engineers were busy completing other projects, such as the UK vz. 59 multi-purpose machine gun or the vz. 58 submachine gun (which in fact was and is the assault rifle, but the Czech military terminology did not accept this term at that time).  Due to their overload, the task to develop a new special submachine gun was assigned to Ing. Miroslav Rybář (1924–1970) who worked at the small-bore arms design department.  This turned out to be an extremely fortunate decision.</p>
<p>Ing. Rybář was a talented engineer with exceptionally deep technical skills and credentials from civil and military area.  He had been involved in firearms design since 1948, but had until then served only as a team member, supervised by senior engineers.  The Skorpion was to be his first individual project, the pinnacle of his career that, unfortunately, ended prematurely.</p>
<p><a><img decoding="async"  alt="" width="100%" data-src="https://dev.sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/evo3.jpg" class="lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /></a></p>
<p>Unlike previous generations of firearms designers, who considered mathematical calculations a dull part of their work and delegated them gladly to others, Rybář started with a comprehensive theoretical analysis.  In fact, he wrote his doctoral thesis on the Skorpion, and presented it successfully at the Military Technical Academy in Brno in 1958.  With such a sound background, the development of the new type of a special submachine gun, aptly named Skorpion, proceeded really fast: lasting only from February 1959, to summer of 1961.</p>
<p>It is worth mentioning that although Rybář was undoubtedly the main architect of this new weapon he was not alone who was involved in this project.  The team counted as many as 13 engineers and we have to mention above all Otakar Galaš (1904–1968).  Galaš was well known as a designer of hunting and sniper rifles (the most famous worldwide being ZG 47 rifle).  Galaš contributed substantially to the development of the Skorpion – not only he was in charge of the sound suppressors’ elaboration and the weapon’s accessories, but having enlarged the barrel bore twist rate he also satisfactorily solved the accuracy of the 7.65mm Browning (.32 ACP) cartridge at distances between 25 to 150 m.  Moreover he became an excellent advocate of the new weapon.  Galaš found a very original way of demonstrating that the Skorpion could be carried covertly underneath one’s clothing: he came to a meeting bringing the submachine gun stuck in the shoulder holster underneath his jacket without anyone noticing it.  During the meeting, when he suddenly opened his jacket and took out the gun, there was no doubt that the Skorpion was suitable for concealed carry.  Jiří Čermák (1926–2006), another legend among firearms designers, who had his name indelibly recorded in the history of weaponry with already mentioned vz. 58 submachine gun, also helped Rybář with this project.  Although Čermák did not work on the Skorpion directly, he was the co-author of one small, but very smart structural element and he claimed the key idea of implementing rate-reducing mechanism.  However, the practicalities of design engineering were taken over by Rybář.</p>
<p><strong>Between Pistol and Submachine Gun</strong><br />
The outcome of Rybář and his team work was a weapon that combined in a unique way the features of both submachine gun and pistol.  The common feature with the submachine guns was first of all the blowback (unlocked) breech, a magazine located in front of the trigger guard and folding stock that enabled shooting from the shoulder.  At the same time the Skorpion used the same cartridge as pistols, and to the certain extent, it was provided with a similar hammer-striking mechanism and the option to fire with the bolt in the forward position, which rendered shooting much more accurate when firing single shots.</p>
<p>For shooting in bursts, the high rate of fire and the muzzle climb were successfully tamed by the mechanical rate-reducer, which provided full control of the weapon also in the automatic mode.  (A certain role has to be attributed also to the weapon’s weight, which slightly exceeded initial requirement by the Ministry of interior, but still with a little exertion enables efficient single-hand hold and with centre of gravity moved forward.)  Various rate reducing mechanisms had been known before, but Rybář´s patent belongs to the ones which were particularly well designed – quite simple be it in design or manufacturing process and at the same time absolutely reliable.</p>
<p>The basic version of the Skorpion was at the end covered by five Czechoslovak patents on behalf of Rybář.  Another four were registered for the following development of variants in other calibres, one of which was additionally used in the series production.  Apart from the rate reducer, the patents covered the technical solutions of the shoulder stock, the trigger mechanism, the spring–loaded bolt stop, and so called retaining plate of the trigger unit which prevented hammer stop pin from falling out (co-author J. Čermák).</p>
<p>The original concept was applied particularly to the wire shoulder stock made from aluminium alloy.  The actual folding was realized around the rear part of the trigger unit with option for easy shoulder stock removal.  The length and stiffness of the shoulder stock due to the weapon compactness are in the limits of practical applicability, nevertheless, the manner of fixation and release in both utmost positions made for a wonderfully simple solution.  Ingeniously, the simple way of unfolding shoulder stock is with a single strike of the palm from the non-shooting hand, from below to the butt, whereupon the rest of the work is smoothly and reliably done by the shoulder stock pin spring, it is hard to find any comparisons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
