<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HK &#8211; Small Arms Defense Journal</title>
	<atom:link href="https://sadefensejournal.com/tag/hk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://sadefensejournal.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 23:12:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Phoenix Defence to Host 2024 Heckler &#038; Koch Factory Training Classes in Las Vegas Area</title>
		<link>https://sadefensejournal.com/phoenix-defence-to-host-2024-heckler-koch-factory-training-classes-in-las-vegas/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SADJ Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2024 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Gear & Training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[armorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HECKLER & KOCH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phoenix Defence]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sadefensejournal.com/?p=89222</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Heckler &#38; Koch Training is holding two weeks of classes at Phoenix Defence in 2024. The civilian classes in March are open to all who qualify under HK’s training requirements; the military/law enforcement classes in October are for government personnel only.  Civilian Classes: DATES SUBJECT March 11-12, 2024 USP (12x students max) March 13, 2024 [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Heckler &amp; Koch Training is holding two weeks of classes at Phoenix Defence in 2024. The civilian classes in March are open to all who qualify under HK’s training requirements; the military/law enforcement classes in October are for government personnel only. </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Civilian Classes:</h3>



<figure class="wp-block-table"><table><tbody><tr><td><strong>DATES</strong></td><td><strong>SUBJECT</strong></td></tr><tr><td>March 11-12, 2024</td><td>USP (12x students max)</td></tr><tr><td>March 13, 2024</td><td>P7 (6x students max)</td></tr><tr><td>March 14-15, 2024</td><td>SP5 (8x students max)</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Military/LE Classes:</h3>



<figure class="wp-block-table"><table><tbody><tr><td><strong>DATES</strong></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>October 07-08, 2024</td><td>Roller Delayed Rifles (G3, HK33, HK53) (12x students max)</td></tr><tr><td>October 09, 2024</td><td>HK69 40mm (5x students max)</td></tr><tr><td>October 10-11, 2024</td><td>HK416 (12x students max)</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<p>Go to <a href="https://training.hk-usa.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">training.hk-usa.com</a>  to review and register for the classes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ORDNANCE ODDITIES</title>
		<link>https://sadefensejournal.com/ordnance-oddities/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Bruce]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2020 15:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Editorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search By Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V12N4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 12]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2020]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advanced Combat Rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AUG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BRITISH MINISTRY OF DEFENSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bullpup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dynamit Nobel's Caseless Cartridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EM-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAMAS G2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flechettes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fusil d'Assaut de la Manufacture d'Armes de Saint-Étienne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heckler & Koch’s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IMP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[L85A2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Le Clairon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Bruce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rodman Laboratories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCAMP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Caliber Machine Pistol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Squad Automatic Weapon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steyr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sturmgewehr 77]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bugle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas B. Dugelby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thompson Ramo Wooldridge group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TRW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volkspistole 70M]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VP70M]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XM235]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadefensejournal.com/wp/?p=83141</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Cold War Conflicts and ‘Brushfire Wars’ 1970s–1980s By Robert Bruce In the course of decades of researching various sources including military and museum archives, Robert Bruce has acquired a treasure trove of photos of what might be considered “odd and unusual weapons.” Here is a follow-on to earlier oddities that appeared in previous issues.  Now, [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2><strong>Cold War Conflicts and ‘Brushfire Wars’</strong></h2>
<h2><strong>1970s–1980s</strong></h2>
<p><em><strong>By Robert Bruce</strong></em></p>
<p><em>In the course of decades of researching various sources including military and museum archives, Robert Bruce has acquired a treasure trove of photos of what might be considered “odd and unusual weapons.” Here is a follow-on to earlier oddities that appeared in previous issues. </em></p>
<p><em> </em><em>Now, with apologies for some of these rough-looking images—presented as they were found—</em><strong>SADJ</strong><em> takes a look at some interesting developments in the tragic aftermath of the Vietnam debacle as U.S. and Allied forces pivoted to other Cold War conflicts and “brushfire wars” around the globe.</em></p>
<p><strong>When the Democrat-dominated</strong> U.S. Congress cut off funding and other military aid to America&#8217;s South Vietnamese allies, a Communist victory was assured. Saigon fell in 1975 to a combined North Vietnamese Army (NVA) and Viet Cong (VC) assault spearheaded by T-54/T-55 tanks supplied by Communist China.</p>
<p>Although badly shaken by what many bitterly considered a betrayal of an ally and callous disregard for the sacrifice of more than 211,000 dead and wounded Americans, the U.S. Armed Forces regrouped and refocused on the harsh realities of conventional—and likely escalating to thermonuclear—warfare with the Soviet Union; a formidable and nearly equal enemy. Joined by NATO Allies (not including the French, that&#8217;s another story) “force modernization” became a priority for rapid upgrades to ships, aircraft, tanks and all types of weaponry. Leaving the big stuff to others, we&#8217;ll concentrate here on just a few notable man-portable arms that were driven by a determination to equip fighting forces with better guns and ammo—some of which were already in the RDT&amp;E (Research, Development, Test &amp; Evaluation) pipeline when Saigon fell.</p>
<p><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async"   alt="" width="3068" height="1886" data-src="https://dev.sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/3648_OO6_01.jpg" class="alignnone wp-image-83142 size-full lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /></p>
<p><figure id="attachment_83143" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-83143" style="width: 3176px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img decoding="async"   alt="" width="3176" height="2031" data-src="https://dev.sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/3648_OO6_02.jpg" class="wp-image-83143 size-full lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-83143" class="wp-caption-text">West German Partisan Pistol: VP70M with Buttstock and Carrying Sling CREDIT: HK GmbH First produced in 1970 in the height of the Cold War, Heckler &amp; Koch’s (HK) Volkspistole 70M (literally “people&#8217;s pistol”) was intended for civilian partisans in the wake of an almost-certain USSR/Warsaw Pact invasion of West Germany. Inspired by the multitudes of cheap and simple weapons dropped by U.S. and Allies behind German lines in WWII to arm resistance forces, it was much more capable than the single-shot OSS “Liberator” pistol and even the quick-takedown British MKII STEN submachine gun. The VP70M is a highly concealable, 9mm 18-round capacity, semiautomatic handgun that instantly converts into a 2200 RPM three-round burst-fire machine pistol with addition of its buttstock/holster. Notably, it carries the distinction of being the first production-run polymer-framed handgun.</figcaption></figure></p>
<p><strong>West German Partisan Pistol</strong>: <em>VP70M with Buttstock and Carrying Sling</em></p>
<p>CREDIT:  HK GMBH</p>
<p><em>First produced in 1970 in the height of the Cold War, Heckler &amp; Koch’s (HK) Volkspistole 70M (literally “people&#8217;s pistol”) was intended for civilian partisans in the wake of an almost-certain USSR/Warsaw Pact invasion of West Germany. Inspired by the multitudes of cheap and simple weapons dropped by U.S. and Allies behind German lines in WWII to arm resistance forces, it was much more capable than the single-shot OSS “Liberator” pistol and even the quick-takedown British MKII STEN submachine gun. The VP70M is a highly concealable, 9mm 18-round capacity, semiautomatic handgun that instantly converts into a 2200 RPM three-round burst-fire machine pistol with addition of its buttstock/holster. Notably, it carries the distinction of being the first production-run polymer-framed handgun.</em></p>
<p><img decoding="async"   alt="" width="537" height="768" data-src="https://dev.sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/3648_OO6_04.jpg" class="alignnone wp-image-83181 size-full lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /></p>
<p><figure id="attachment_83157" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-83157" style="width: 1280px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async"   alt="" width="1280" height="896" data-src="https://dev.sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/3648_OO6_03.jpg" class="wp-image-83157 size-full lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-83157" class="wp-caption-text">Underwater Revolver: Gun, Underwater Defense, Mk 1 Mod 0 Like the one seen here, locked away for posterity in the arms vault of the Naval Historical Society, the Mk 1 Mod 0 was developed late in the Vietnam War for use against enemy swimmers and continued in service with men of the Navy’s Underwater Demolition Teams and SEALs in the Cold War. It&#8217;s a seriously updated techno version of the multi-barrel “pepperbox” revolver of the 1800s. The removable barrel/chamber cluster holds six sealed Mk59 cartridges, each loaded with a wickedly long, needle-like tungsten dart.</figcaption></figure></p>
<p><strong>Underwater Revolver: Gun, Underwater Defense, Mk 1 Mod 0</strong></p>
<p>CREDIT: <em>ROBERT BRUCE</em></p>
<p><em>Like the one seen here, locked away for posterity in the arms vault of the Naval Historical Society, the Mk 1 Mod 0 was developed late in the Vietnam War for use against enemy swimmers and continued in service with men of the Navy’s Underwater Demolition Teams and SEALs in the Cold War. It&#8217;s a seriously updated techno version of the multi-barrel “pepperbox” revolver of the 1800s. The removable barrel/chamber cluster holds six sealed Mk59 cartridges, each loaded with a wickedly long, needle-like tungsten dart.</em></p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async"   alt="" width="2816" height="1880" data-src="https://dev.sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/3648_OO6_06.jpg" class="alignnone wp-image-83160 size-full lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /></p>
<p><strong>Heavy Duty Grenade Gun: 40mm Philco-Ford CROW</strong></p>
<p>CREDIT: <em>NAVAL HISTORICAL SOCIETY ARCHIVES</em></p>
<p><em>Because grenade machine guns firing the M79 “Blooper&#8217;s” low-velocity 40mm grenades proved inadequate in Vietnam, logic demanded a weapon that could fire the newly developed, powerful and long-reaching 40mm M384 and M385 High Velocity ammo. But how to tame this hot round&#8217;s formidable recoil in a grenade machine gun (GMG) of manageable size and weight? In 1970, Philco-Ford&#8217;s Aeronutronic Division got a developmental award for their Counter Recoil-Operated Weapon (CROW) concept: “&#8230; the principle of converting kinematic energy of the round into potential energy. The energy stored in various springs is released during the counter recoil stroke to open the barrel, eject the spent round and feed the next round.” The resulting 35-pound GMG demonstrated effective operation at rates of fire up to 400 RPM. Nice try, but the prize went to Naval Ordnance Louisville&#8217;s MK19, which is still serving today.</em></p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async"   alt="" width="3192" height="1459" data-src="https://dev.sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/3648_OO6_07.jpg" class="alignnone wp-image-83161 size-full lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /></p>
<p><strong>SAW Contender: Rodman Laboratories XM235</strong></p>
<p>CREDIT: <em>U.S. ARMY ORDNANCE MUSEUM</em></p>
<p><em>This interesting mini machine gun was entered in the Army&#8217;s 1975-1976 Squad Automatic Weapon (SAW) trials. Chambered in the Army&#8217;s specified 6x45mm experimental cartridge, its novel operation system—enhancing full-auto accuracy—was patented by its government design team as the Modular Lightweight Squad Automatic Weapon System, “&#8230; having symmetrical forces applied to recoiling parts by use of two parallel gas pressure rods acting in unison. An integral sprocket feed system is actuated by the recoiling parts and avoids gross asymmetrical movements about the weapon&#8217;s center of gravity resulting from shifting ammunition weight. A dual tube receiver and dual gas system is featured in the weapon.” In the end, the Army chose FN&#8217;s Minimi in 5.56x45mm NATO, serving now as the M249 light machine gun.</em></p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async"   alt="" width="2816" height="1880" data-src="https://dev.sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/3648_OO6_08.jpg" class="alignnone wp-image-83162 size-full lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /></p>
<p><strong>Fire and Forget It: TRW&#8217;s Low-Maintenance Rifle</strong></p>
<p>CREDIT:<em> AUTHOR&#8217;S COLLECTION</em></p>
<p><em>It isn&#8217;t PC to assert that many if not most Third-World troops are culturally indifferent to properly maintaining their weapons, so we&#8217;ll just present this one as an interestingly cheap and simple shoulder weapon for U.S. counterinsurgency forces to arm certain soldiers. Responding to a 1971 Army requirement, the Thompson Ramo Wooldridge group (TRW) offered this 7.26-pound, 34-inch-long, 450 RPM, 5.56mm Firestick, only externally reminiscent of the superlative, sophisticated WWII German FG 42. Its equally simple and cheaply printed 1973 Tech Manual dryly notes in typewritten prose: “&#8230; a 5.56mm magazine-fed, gas operated, air cooled, shoulder weapon &#8230; designed for use as an automatic weapon and functions from the open bolt position. &#8230; The rifle is fabricated from corrosion-resistant materials and is semi-permanently lubricated by the dry film process.” Less than a dozen were made, and the project was abandoned. After all, millions of uncannily reliable AKs were available worldwide—super simple, dirt cheap and with mountains of 7.62x39mm ammo.</em></p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async"   alt="" width="1936" height="1288" data-src="https://dev.sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/3648_OO6_09.jpg" class="alignnone wp-image-83163 size-full lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /></p>
<p><strong>Piggyback Projectiles: Frankford Arsenal&#8217;s Folded Ammunition</strong></p>
<p>CREDIT: <em>U.S. ARMY ORDNANCE MUSEUM</em></p>
<p><em>Some engineers—ever eager to explore even marginal improvements to conventional cartridges—have produced some genuine oddities. Not the least of these is presented in a “Feasibility Study of 5.56m Folded Ammunition System,” published in September 1976 by the Munitions Development and Engineering Directorate at the Army&#8217;s Frankford Arsenal. Citing advantages including efficient stowage, higher performance in less overall space, weight reduction, etc., it boasts: “The shorter ammunition length shortens the weapon bolt stroke required to feed the ammunition and extract the case after firing. This feature enables a shortening of weapon length in the chamber/breech location.” So, what has transpired in some 4 decades since? Most notably not Frankford&#8217;s folded ammo but the HK G11&#8217;s molded brick caseless and AAI/Textron&#8217;s lipstick-tube cased-telescoped ammo.</em></p>
<h2><strong>BULLPUP MASHUP</strong></h2>
<p>“The EM-2, a British rifle fleetingly adopted in the UK in 1951 as &#8216;Rifle, No. 9,&#8217; was the first attempt in the world to field a general-issue military shoulder weapon based on the &#8216;compact&#8217; or bullpup system.” (R. Blake Stevens in the introduction to Thomas B. Dugelby&#8217;s 1980 Collector Grade book, <em>EM-2 Concept and Design—A Rifle Ahead of its Time.</em>)</p>
<p><em>Bullpup??!!</em> Most simply defined as the term applies to small arms, a “bullpup” design puts the magazine and firing chamber behind the pistol grip/trigger group that&#8217;s typically located about midway along the length of the weapon. Why? For compactness, balance and quick handling.</p>
<p>There are advantages and disadvantages to this arrangement, kicking off all manner of controversy between proponents of traditional configurations and cocky challengers. Evidence of resistance to change is readily seen in the fact that the first promising young litter of Brit bullpups died from neglect. But that didn&#8217;t end the breed, so let&#8217;s zoom in for a closer look at some bullpups born in the ‘70s and ‘80s.</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async"   alt="" width="1763" height="1126" data-src="https://dev.sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/3648_OO6_10.jpg" class="alignnone wp-image-83164 size-full lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /></p>
<p><strong>U.S. Air Force Arm Gun: Colt&#8217;s Lightweight Submachine Gun</strong></p>
<p>CREDIT: <em>U.S. ARMY ORDNANCE MUSEUM</em></p>
<p><em>Seen here circa 1969 in what&#8217;s likely a conceptual drawing from a presentation of the remarkable IMP-221 (Individual Multi-Purpose), this unique bullpup pistol, firing hot .221 Remington Fireball cartridges, was intended to be a compact and deadly efficient survival weapon for downed aviators. Credited to engineer Dale Davis of the USAF Armament Laboratories, it evolved from the more conventional Colt SCAMP (Small Caliber Machine Pistol) into an ergonomically unique solution to the challenges of producing an ultra-compact weapon with acceptable stopping power and practical range. Its bullpup design provided good balance, and the receiver with magazine along the arm provided some stability, swiveling to accommodate right or left handers.</em></p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async"   alt="" width="1936" height="1288" data-src="https://dev.sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/3648_OO6_11.jpg" class="alignnone wp-image-83165 size-full lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /></p>
<p><strong>Colt IMP</strong></p>
<p>CREDIT: <em>U.S. ARMY ORDNANCE MUSEUM</em></p>
<p><em>For a variety of reasons—not the least of which was the absurd difficulty of accurately shooting the thing—the USAF-Colt IMP initiative was ultimately rejected. But independent gun maker Gwinn Firearms apparently appreciated its novelty and saw potential for civilian or perhaps law enforcement sales, producing the Bushmaster Arm Pistol around 1972. It&#8217;s a very close version in .223/5.56 NATO, economically utilizing a lot of standard AR-15/M16 components such as Eugene Stoner&#8217;s familiar multi-lug, rotating bolt.</em></p>
<p><figure id="attachment_83166" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-83166" style="width: 5016px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async"   alt="" width="5016" height="3273" data-src="https://dev.sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/3648_OO6_12.jpg" class="wp-image-83166 size-full lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-83166" class="wp-caption-text">Pictured left to right are the SA80-A2, XL 60 and EM-2 assault rifles. The EM-2, also known as Rifle No.9 Mk1 or Janson rifle, which was an experimental British assault rifle. It was briefly adopted by British forces in 1951, but the decision was overturned very shortly thereafter by Winston Churchill&#8217;s incoming government in an effort to secure NATO standardisation of small arms and ammunition. An innovative weapon with the compact bullpup layout and an optical sight, it used one of the early intermediate cartridges (a concept introduced by the Germans with the 7.92×33mm Kurz) as a result of combat experience and German advances in weapons design during World War II. As the EM-2 could not be easily adapted to the longer and more powerful 7.62×51mm NATO round, it faded from use. However, the bullpup layout for a British service rifle was finally adopted some years later in form of the SA80 assault rifle, the EM-2&#8217;s spiritual successor, which remains in service today. The XL60 series of experimental firearms was the first generation of what was initially known as the ‘485 Weapon System’, designed and produced at the Royal Small Arms Factory (RSAF) Enfield, located in North London, United Kingdom. The term ‘485 Weapon System’, so-named for the weapon’s 4.85 mm calibre, was later dropped in favour of ‘Enfield Weapon System’ or EWS, which persisted until at least 1982 but was ultimately also side-lined. Instead, the name ‘Small Arms of the 1980s’ or ‘SA80’ was adopted and remains in use to this day. This term is used alongside the land service or ‘L’ designations (e.g. L85A2). Interestingly, this name was in use from the very beginning by the Ministry of Defence (MoD), sometimes with the prefix ‘Section’ as in ‘infantry section’ or squad. As per the preliminary study and MoD specification, the EWS/SA80 system comprised rifle and light machine gun variants, known by their period NATO euphemisms of ‘Indivi</figcaption></figure></p>
<p><strong>Brit Bullpups: Evolution of the “Rifle, No. 9”</strong></p>
<p>CREDIT: <em>WIKIMEDIA COMMONS</em></p>
<p><em>Seen on the far right is a well-worn trials version of the “EM-2” that soon followed the No. 9, likely chambered for an experimental 6.25x43mm “intermediate type” cartridge. To its left are later variants of the design; the first is identified as an XL60 in .280/4.85mm, and the more recent SA80 A2 (L85A2) in 5.56mm NATO. All of these bullpups are a radical break in British Army rifle tradition, with the SA80 series officially adopted as standard in 1987.</em></p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async"   alt="" width="1268" height="3306" data-src="https://dev.sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/3648_OO6_13.png" class="alignnone wp-image-83167 size-full lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /></p>
<p><strong>Intermediate Cartridge Showdown: .280 vs. .223</strong></p>
<p>CREDIT: <em>WIKIMEDIA COMMONS</em></p>
<p><em>On the left is the .280/4.85x49mm, the Brit hopeful in NATO&#8217;s weapon and ammo trials of 1978-1979, standing side-by-side with what became the NATO standard .223/5.56x45mm (right). The difficulty of “herding cats” applies here with each of several nations offering their favorite rifles and cartridges with the goal of standardizing to the extent possible for “interoperability.” What emerged was each nation kept its preferred rifle though chambered for America&#8217;s mandated 5.56mm fed from America&#8217;s M16 mags.</em></p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async"   alt="" width="2750" height="1800" data-src="https://dev.sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/3648_OO6_14.jpg" class="alignnone wp-image-83168 size-full lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /></p>
<p><strong>SA80/L85</strong></p>
<p>CREDIT: <em>BRITISH MINISTRY OF DEFENSE</em></p>
<p><em>2001: A steely-eyed Royal Marine Commando proudly cradles his newly upgraded L85A2 bullpup (topped with a well-used SUSAT day sight) while providing security for a nuclear-armed submarine during Operation Veritas. Cheaply and poorly made in Britain in the beginning by RSAF Enfield, the rifle was plagued with reliability problems, and only a radical rework by the German firm HK in the early 2000s and subsequent manufacture as the A2 version rescued it.</em></p>
<p><figure id="attachment_83169" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-83169" style="width: 1728px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async"   alt="" width="1728" height="1152" data-src="https://dev.sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/3648_OO6_15.jpeg" class="wp-image-83169 size-full lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-83169" class="wp-caption-text">French Armed Forces, armed with FAMAS F1 assault rifles, participate in the Memorial Day ceremony at the LaFayette Escadrille Monument in Paris, France.</figcaption></figure></p>
<p><strong>“Bugle” Blaster: The</strong> <strong>French FAMAS</strong></p>
<p>CREDIT: <em>U.S. AIR FORCE VIA WIKIMEDIA COMMONS</em></p>
<p><em>As a member of NATO, the French participate in defense of Europe and occasional forays overseas. So a certain amount of interoperability is evident in the distinctive FAMAS G2 (Fusil d&#8217;Assaut de la Manufacture d&#8217;Armes de Saint-Étienne) assault rifle including 5.56mm chambering and M16 standard magazines. The French’s quirky penchant for home-grown designs led to this delayed blowback-operated bullpup with the nickname “Le Clairon” (“The Bugle”), entering service in 1978. Interestingly, the bugle has blown its last notes, and France&#8217;s soldiers now carry the superlative German HK416. Sacre bleu!</em></p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async"   alt="" width="1200" height="1600" data-src="https://dev.sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/3648_OO6_16.jpg" class="alignnone wp-image-83170 size-full lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /></p>
<p><strong><em>Armee-Universal-Gewehr</em></strong><strong>: The Austrian Steyr AUG</strong></p>
<p>CREDIT: <em>AUSTRIAN MINISTRY OF DEFENSE AND SPORT</em></p>
<p><em>With its rakish profile including integral optic and streamlined polymer housing, the AUG would seem perfect for arming starship troopers in most any sci-fi flick. Entering Austrian Army service in 1978, the Sturmgewehr 77 (assault rifle) is a truly modular weapon that can be immediately configured without tools from a standard version with a 20-inch barrel into a short-barrel submachine gun, carbine, heavy-barrel sniper rifle or a squad auto weapon firing from an open bolt. While firing 5.56mm NATO ammo, early versions were fed from proprietary waffled translucent polymer mags, an interoperability problem corrected in later NATO versions, also fitted with Picatinny accessory rails. The AUG proved enormously successful and was purchased in quantity by numerous countries, most notably Ireland, Australia and New Zealand.</em></p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async"   alt="" width="1024" height="675" data-src="https://dev.sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/3648_OO6_17-1.jpg" class="alignnone wp-image-83178 size-full lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /></p>
<p><strong>Leap Ahead Assault Rifles:</strong> <strong>Advanced Combat Rifle Program</strong></p>
<p>CREDIT: <em>ROBERT BRUCE</em></p>
<p><em>Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, 1989: Soldiers at a press preview showcase the “final four” candidates that will travel to Fort Benning, Georgia, for sudden-death playoffs on a super high tech instrumented, combat simulation range. From top left and clockwise: Steyr ACR firing flechettes telescoped inside polymer tubes; Colt ACR, a modified M16A2 firing “duplex” (two stacked bullets) in conventional brass cases; AAI ACR firing brass-cased flechettes; and the HK ACR firing 4.73mm caseless cartridges. While marching underneath the ACR program banner of “doubling hit probability,” in reality the Army was grasping for something better than its somewhat serviceable M16 rifles and NATO 5.56mm ammo. Formally launched in 1986, it flamed out 4 years and $300 million later because none reportedly achieved the stated goal. Since then, GIs have wondered if their M16s and M4s really are the best they deserve, a doubt lingering for 30 years that may be set aside by the winner in the Army&#8217;s Next Generation Squad Weapon trials.</em></p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async"   alt="" width="4113" height="2742" data-src="https://dev.sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/3648_OO6_18.jpg" class="alignnone wp-image-83172 size-full lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /></p>
<p><strong>Brick Firing Bullpup: HK G11</strong></p>
<p>CREDIT: <em>HK GMBH VIA WIKIMEDIA</em></p>
<p><em>Undoubtedly the most radical concept—not only in the ACR program but in any previous practical pairing of gun and ammo—this wunderkind is an engineering and tactical tour de force, birthed in the 1970s from the marriage of West German companies Dynamit Nobel and Heckler &amp; Koch. Among its most striking attributes is its little, brick-like rectangular caseless cartridges made from a nearly magical propellant, compressed and formed with a skinny 4.73mm projectile nestled snugly in a tunnel. On detonation in the oscillating chamber, the bullet zips downrange and everything else disappears, needing no extraction or ejection. It fires in semiauto, auto (460 RPM) and three-round bursts at an astonishing 2,100 RPM. This last intended to maximize accuracy and multi-hit lethality because the third bullet is well on its way before any muzzle jump. The engineering wizardry required for this comes from a vertically oriented, disc-like “chamber” that feeds at 12 o&#8217;clock and rotates 45 degrees to align with the barrel at 3 o&#8217;clock to fire. Perplexed? Do a Wiki search for details on this German military marvel. A brilliant live-fire demonstration, starring the late, great Jim Schatz in the G11 gunner role is readily available on YouTube. Search “G11K2 Demonstration—Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 1990.”</em></p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async"   alt="" width="1600" height="1200" data-src="https://dev.sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/3648_OO6_18a.jpg" class="alignnone wp-image-83173 size-full lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /></p>
<p><strong>Dynamit Nobel&#8217;s Caseless Cartridge</strong></p>
<p>CREDIT: <em>WIKIMEDIA</em></p>
<p><em>A near miracle in chemical engineering and ultra-modern manufacture, the G11&#8217;s remarkable ammo is seen here with its components. The HITP (high ignition temperature propellant) is shaped into a tiny 1.3-inch long brick, hollowed out to hold a cup-shaped primer/booster and a 4.73x33mm projectile, held centered by a plastic cap. Resistant to moisture, crushing and cook off, it kicks out its 51-grain FMJ bullet at 930 m/s with scant recoil.</em></p>
<p><em><img loading="lazy" decoding="async"   alt="" width="1356" height="1052" data-src="https://dev.sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/3648_OO6_19.jpg" class="alignnone wp-image-83176 size-full lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /></em></p>
<p><strong>Caseless LMG</strong></p>
<p>CREDIT: <em>HK GmbH</em></p>
<p><em>Although unknown if this ever went beyond its conceptual drawing, the HK G11 system with Dynamit Nobel&#8217;s caseless brick ammo could almost certainly have been developed as a SAW/LMG in at least prototype form. Presumably, the vexing problem of cook off from overheating in fast, sustained firing would be solved in some manner, but would this work with a rotating disc chamber? Other caseless contemplations included a handgun-like personal defense weapon. In the end, West Germany&#8217;s plan to adopt the G11 died of monetary starvation because of many financial and other problems after the Soviet Bloc crumbled and “reunification” followed with its impoverished Eastern brethren.</em></p>
<p><strong>NEXT TIME</strong></p>
<p><em>In the next installment of Ordnance Oddities we&#8217;ll give a nod to the next 2 decades with such well-intentioned efforts as the U.S. Army&#8217;s Land Warrior initiative. What were they “imagineering” for 21<sup>st</sup> century soldiers? </em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.sadefensejournal.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/3648_OO6_19.tif"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-83174" src="http://www.sadefensejournal.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/3648_OO6_19.tif" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>REPLACING THE G3</title>
		<link>https://sadefensejournal.com/replacing-the-g3/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryan Ferreira]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Feb 2020 23:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Editorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search By Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V12N2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 12]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2020]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bryan Ferreira]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FN SCAR®-H]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FN SCAR®-L]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FN40 Grenade Launcher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mepro MX3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meprolight M5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trijicon VCOG]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadefensejournal.com/wp/?p=55982</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[THE PORTUGUESE ARMY FINDS COMBAT COMFORT IN FN SCAR The Portuguese Army, after decades of struggling to get a new service rifle to replace its old battle rifle—the FMP G3 (a license built in Portugal HK G3)—has completed the process of acquiring an assault rifle and is being re-equipped with the SCAR®-L, in 5.56x45mm, built [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async"   alt="" width="3300" height="2200" data-src="https://dev.sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/3557_1.jpg" class="alignnone wp-image-55983 size-full lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /></p>
<h3><strong>THE PORTUGUESE ARMY FINDS COMBAT COMFORT IN FN SCAR</strong></h3>
<p>The Portuguese Army, after decades of struggling to get a new service rifle to replace its old battle rifle—the FMP G3 (a license built in Portugal HK G3)—has completed the process of acquiring an assault rifle and is being re-equipped with the SCAR®-L, in 5.56x45mm, built by Fabrique Nationale (FN) Herstal in Belgium. The Army has also bought the FN SCAR®-H, a battle rifle in 7.62x51mm that will be used as the Designated Marksman Rifle (DMR) at the squad level. To augment these rifles’ firepower, the Army purchased the FN40 Grenade Launcher (40x46mm); this can be attached to both rifles, SCAR-L and -H, or it can be used in the stand-alone configuration.</p>
<p>The FN SCAR is one of the best rifles of our times. With extensive use by the Belgian Armed Forces, U.S. Special Operations Command, French Special Forces, Slovenian and Lithuanian Army, as well as numerous other special police forces from other nations, this is an extremely modern weapon, with all that is required for high-intensity combat, and features reliability and ergonomics appropriate to the rigors of the battlefield. This is a tool that any well-equipped and prepared Armed Forces would wish to have in their inventories.</p>
<p><strong>The Pursuit of All-Around Weaponry</strong></p>
<p>The pursuit for the replacement of the G3 was made through NSPA (NATO Support and Procurement Agency), based in Luxembourg. It was a public tender with all the big weapons manufacturers trying to accomplish the requested specifications and capabilities. The Army based its requirements in tune with the ideas of NATO working groups for light weaponry and defining some main lines according to its missions and national defense strategy.</p>
<p>Weapons had to be reliable and accurate in any weather conditions and with the rigors of combat. They had to be maneuverable, ergonomic and compact enough for vehicle and helicopter operations and be easily deployed in parachute operations. They also had to be able to take the modern accessories used in combat, namely a silencer, sight, flashlight and laser designator. Both SCAR-L and -H fit all these requirements. FN has one of the highest reputations for its barrels’ quality, manufacturing and supplying many companies that manufacture AR-15s in the U.S. FN SCAR rifles are veterans in combat; they have been used extensively in Afghanistan with an excellent report. FN SCARs have a folding stock that is also adjustable in length; this makes these weapons extremely compact for storage or transportation. The top and low Picatinny rail allows for inclusion of any accessories needed—additional side rails can be added for other necessary items, making for full 360º coverage.</p>
<p><figure id="attachment_55984" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-55984" style="width: 4200px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async"   alt="" width="4200" height="2800" data-src="https://dev.sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/3557_5.jpg" class="wp-image-55984 size-full lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-55984" class="wp-caption-text"><em>Portuguese Army FN40 Grenade Launcher right view. Retracted stock and sights deployed in the stand-alone configuration.</em></figcaption></figure></p>
<p>The assault rifle and designated marksman rifle had to have the most communality parts possible. This is important not only for the training of soldiers, where they can easily transition from one weapon to the other without any additional training, but for logistics who can maintain a reserve of parts that will work in both guns. The FN SCAR-L and the SCAR-H have many parts in common; the most obvious is the stock that can be changed directly from one to the other. These rifles are disassembled exactly the same way, and their controls are placed in the same places, allowing soldiers to maintain a muscle memory even in the most stressful situations of combat. The SCAR-H even has a caliber conversion kit that enables it to be converted to fire 5.56x45mm ammunition.</p>
<p><figure id="attachment_55985" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-55985" style="width: 3600px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async"   alt="" width="3600" height="2400" data-src="https://dev.sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/3557_3.jpg" class="wp-image-55985 size-full lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-55985" class="wp-caption-text"><em>Members of the Portuguese Army Special Operations Forces do a live-fire shooting drill with some FN SCAR-Ls they recently tested before delivery of their new rifles.</em></figcaption></figure></p>
<p><figure id="attachment_55986" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-55986" style="width: 3300px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async"   alt="" width="3300" height="2200" data-src="https://dev.sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/3557_6.jpg" class="wp-image-55986 size-full lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-55986" class="wp-caption-text"><em>Portuguese Army FN SCAR-H in 7.62x51mm with the 16-inch barrel. Equipped with a two-point sling, bipod, five-position foregrip and the Trijicon VCOG 1-6&#215;24 sight.</em></figcaption></figure></p>
<p><strong>SCAR Sub-Compact</strong></p>
<p>FN Herstal has a Sub-Compact (SC) version of the SCAR-L. These guns are almost fully interchangeable and based on the modulatory concept of the SCAR. There is also a conversion kit that transforms the SC into the .300BLK caliber by a simple change of the barrel. The SCAR Sub-Compact, even though it is not part of the Army contract, has already aroused the interest of the Portuguese Special Operations community; it is a perfect weapon to replace the old, outdated HK MP5 and Uzi submachine guns still in service. The Army is even considering using the .300BLK version because of its performance with subsonic ammo being able to silence any shots and being perfect to replace MP5SD versions, increasing in this way any SOF Task Unit Firepower.</p>
<p><strong>New Materials</strong></p>
<p>The Army requested that weapons should be in a color based on the Coyote/Flat Dark Earth pattern and be constructed in the lightest material possible. The SCAR (<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Operations_Forces"><strong>S</strong>pecial Operations Forces</a> <strong>C</strong>ombat <strong>A</strong>ssault <strong>R</strong>ifle) was from the beginning a design made to replace the M4, so in order to improve upon the M4 reliability but maintain a low-weight gun, new materials had to be incorporated. The SCAR uses aluminum and steel in crucial areas where metal is needed, but what makes it different than other contenders is the extensive use of Polymer. The Portuguese SCAR-L, with a 14.5-inch barrel, weighs only 3.5kg/7.71lb and the SCAR-H, with a 16-inch barrel, has an impressive weight of 3.9kg/8.59lb (without magazine), being much lighter that other competitors. The color Black has a terrible contrast against camouflaged uniforms. With the use of Polymer, FN had no difficulty in using an FDE color in its guns and achieved an excellent combination that presents a unique, beautiful weapon with excellent blend-in capacity.</p>
<p><figure id="attachment_55987" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-55987" style="width: 3300px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async"   alt="" width="3300" height="2200" data-src="https://dev.sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/3557_4.jpg" class="wp-image-55987 size-full lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-55987" class="wp-caption-text"><em>Members of the Portuguese Army Special Operations Forces pose with some FN SCAR-Ls they recently tested before delivery of their new rifles. They will also be receiving the FN Minimi MK3 in 5.56x45mm.</em></figcaption></figure></p>
<p><strong>Sights</strong></p>
<p>The contract for the weapons will include a small batch of sights to start testing some concepts. The SCAR-L will come equipped with an Aimpoint CompM4, but the Army is already considering other dot sights like the Meprolight MEPRO M5 or the Trijicon MRO and even improving on this capability with the Elcan SpecterDR 1-4x, Elcan SpecterOS 4x or Trijicon ACOG 4&#215;32. The SCAR-H had to be equipped with a sight that had a variable power and a Bullet Drop Compensator Reticle, so the winning choice was the Trijicon VCOG 1-6&#215;24, but as with the assault rifles, these come in small numbers, and the Army is already thinking of improvements to the Designated Marksman capability with sights like the Nightforce ATACR 1-8&#215;24 F1 and the Meprolight NYX thermal sights.</p>
<p><figure id="attachment_55988" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-55988" style="width: 3300px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async"   alt="" width="3300" height="2200" data-src="https://dev.sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/3557_8.jpg" class="wp-image-55988 size-full lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-55988" class="wp-caption-text"><em>Left-side view of the Portuguese Army FN SCAR-L in 5.56x45mm with a 14.5-inch barrel. Equipped with the Meprolight M5 Electro-Optical Red Dot Sight.</em></figcaption></figure></p>
<p><strong>An Interesting Feature</strong></p>
<p>One very interesting feature of this contract is the inclusion of a bayonet. And although the use of this weapon is debatable in modern combat, the use of a combat knife is not. Therefore the Portuguese Army made a very smart move—they managed to include the Extrema Ratio FULCRUM Bayonet; this way each soldier will have an excellent combat knife that doubles as bayonet.</p>
<p><figure id="attachment_55989" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-55989" style="width: 5100px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async"   alt="" width="5100" height="3400" data-src="https://dev.sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/3557_11.jpg" class="wp-image-55989 size-full lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-55989" class="wp-caption-text"><em>The author tests an FN SCAR-H with a 13-inch barrel. This one differs from the rifles that will supply the Portuguese Army, as these will be for the designated marksmen and will have a Flat Dark Earth color and having a 16-inch barrel. This one is also equipped with a Meprolight NYX Thermal Sight.</em></figcaption></figure></p>
<p><strong>Combat Performance</strong></p>
<p>The Portuguese Army has made a very important step. The choice of the new assault rifle will positively influence its combat performance with hit probability increasing radically over the old G3 Battle Rifle. This is not only because the Army is re-equipping with a new caliber (5.56x45mm) but because it changes the firepower dynamics of the Army’s small units with the inclusion of an excellent DMR. Assaulters will have an assault rifle with nine magazines (270 rounds), with a weight of 5.1kg/11.24lb, including magazines, while the DMR, with the same nine magazines, will carry 180 rounds with 6.8kg/14.99lb. The 40mm grenade launcher also will bring improved capacity, as it is very light and easy to use.</p>
<p>From the author’s perspective of all the testing and training done with these weapons, the SCAR-L is a wonderful rifle to employ. Being used to working around AR-15 and Kalashnikov rifles, it is a perfect combination of both. The FN SCAR-L is an extremely reliable and accurate gun. It is light but very easy to control; in full-auto fire, its relatively low rate of fire makes it completely controllable, even in a full magazine dump. The SCAR-L takes STANAG magazines and can take every accessory available for Picatinny rails. The ambidextrous magazine release allows right- and left-handed soldiers to make easy changes. While some people complain that the slide lock should be in both sides, the author disagrees, as he has seen problems with those designs—too many buttons, KISS (Keep It Simple and Stupid). The reciprocating charging handle has been controversial since the beginning of the rifle’s production, so much so that FN now offers the gun with a non-reciprocating charging handle. The author, being used to working with Kalashnikov-style assault rifles, finds it very normal; so much that he, when using a SCAR, usually puts the charging handle in the right side of the gun and works it exactly like an AK. The fact that the charging handle is located at middle body makes it more ergonomic than an AR-15. The stock is modular and comfortable; it is easy to work around and has a nice cheek piece that helps with sight picture in some higher sights. The author also finds the weapon’s maintenance very simple and very straightforward to disassemble and assemble and then easy to clean or change any parts needed. The only drawback in this rifle is that with intense volume of fire, the handguard heats up really fast, and the use of gloves is a blessing. The SCAR-H is an impressive DMR and has, in the author´s opinion, no match currently. It is a reliable and accurate gun for its intended function, probably the lightest in the market. It has all the qualities of the -L version, except that it takes FN proprietary magazines and would be more interoperable if it took magazines compatible with AR-10/SR-25/M110 rifles, like the Magpul ones.</p>
<p><figure id="attachment_56033" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-56033" style="width: 3300px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async"   alt="" width="3300" height="2200" data-src="https://dev.sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/3557_13.jpg" class="wp-image-56033 size-full lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /><figcaption id="caption-attachment-56033" class="wp-caption-text">The author tests an FN SCAR-H equivalent to the one that will supply the Portuguese Army designated marksmen. This rifle is equipped with the Meprolight M5 Electro-Optical Red Dot Sight and the Mepro MX3 3x Magnifier, but the Army rifles will use the Trijicon VCOG 1-6&#215;24 sight.</figcaption></figure></p>
<p><strong>Final Thought</strong></p>
<p>The Portuguese Army ended up with an excellent result for its tender. Replacement of the G3 Battle Rifle with the FN SCAR-L/-H will start within the Rapid Reaction Brigade. Special Operations Forces, commandos and paratroopers will be the first units to receive the SCAR rifles, so that they can deploy them to the operating theaters where they are engaged in the Middle East and Africa. The Army is now equipped by one of the world&#8217;s largest manufacturers of small arms and with one of the best assault rifles in service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
