<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>H.B. Hong &#8211; Small Arms Defense Journal</title>
	<atom:link href="https://sadefensejournal.com/tag/h-b-hong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://sadefensejournal.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2023 17:06:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>K12 South Korean Light Machine Gun</title>
		<link>https://sadefensejournal.com/k12-south-korean-light-machine-gun/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SADJ Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2014 07:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industry Profiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search By Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V6N3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daewoo Precision Industry Co.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H.B. Hong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K12]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sadefensejournal.com/wp/?p=2751</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[From 1990 to very recently, the ROK (Republic of Korea; or South Korea) army had a tendency to reduce the presence of 7.62mm NATO light or medium machine guns.  From the 1970s to 1990, the South Korea military used M60 GPMGs as their ‘almost universal’ machine gun; first supplied from the U.S. as military support when the ROK military dispatched a considerable number of troops to Vietnam and then manufactured under license by Daewoo Precision Industry, Co. (today’s S&#038;T Motive).  It was used everywhere machine guns were used: infantry, vehicle mounted, helicopter mounted, etc.  Since the ROK military was heavily influenced under U.S. doctrine, it was quite natural and that influence led to the development of the K3 SAW (Squad Automatic Weapon), since the U.S. Army used the M249 SAW from the 1980s.  The K3 is the ‘Koreanized’ version of the famous Minimi, and the role of K3 in ROK Army/Marine Corps was initially quite similar to that of the M249 in U.S. military.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>ABOVE: Shooting with spade grip only. Even with this configuration control was not that difficult.</i></p>
<p>From 1990 to very recently, the ROK (Republic of Korea; or South Korea) army had a tendency to reduce the presence of 7.62mm NATO light or medium machine guns. From the 1970s to 1990, the South Korea military used M60 GPMGs as their ‘almost universal’ machine gun; first supplied from the U.S. as military support when the ROK military dispatched a considerable number of troops to Vietnam and then manufactured under license by Daewoo Precision Industry, Co. (today’s S&amp;T Motive). It was used everywhere machine guns were used: infantry, vehicle mounted, helicopter mounted, etc. Since the ROK military was heavily influenced under U.S. doctrine, it was quite natural and that influence led to the development of the K3 SAW (Squad Automatic Weapon), since the U.S. Army used the M249 SAW from the 1980s. The K3 is the ‘Koreanized’ version of the famous Minimi, and the role of K3 in ROK Army/Marine Corps was initially quite similar to that of the M249 in U.S. military. However, during the 2000s, things began to change. While M60s became old and gradually needed to be replaced, ROK military changed many of them with K3s. Unlike the U.S. military who uses medium machine guns for platoon level fire support, the South Korean army replaced many old M60s in infantry outfits with K3s – thus removing medium machine guns for infantry. Vehicle-mounted and helicopter-mounted MGs mostly remained to be M60 variants, but even for that role some K3s were employed; for example, a few Korean made armored vehicles were armed only with K3s. <div class="img " style="width:100%px;">
	<a><img decoding="async"  alt="" width="100%" data-src="http://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/k1202.jpg" class="lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /></a>
	<div>The barrel change is accomplished the same as the Minimi. No special tools of gloves are required. </div>
</div> Since the K3 is still in production (unlike the M60, whose assembly line was closed long ago), replacing M60s with K3s may have seemed reasonable to ROK military bureaucrats. However, as vehicle and aircraft mounted weapons, 5.56mm machine guns have short range and limited power. So most Korean tanks, armored cars and virtually all helicopters are still armed with 7.62mm MGs, &#8211; almost all of them M60 variants. Yet, replacements for those M60s were not easy to come by. Simply put, the ROK military didn’t want to spend money on that. While they have money for buying Aegis destroyers or F-15 fighter jets, they thought buying new MGs to replace the venerable M60 was a waste of money. They saw no reason for replacing M60s that were still working relatively well. <div class="img " style="width:100%px;">
	<a><img decoding="async"  alt="" width="100%" data-src="http://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/k1203.jpg" class="lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /></a>
	<div>The safety for the spade grip is on top and in front of the butterfly trigger. It is shown here in the safe position.</div>
</div> <b>New Helicopter Arrives</b> But things changed quite rapidly during last few years because of the introduction of new helicopters. From 2006 to 2012, Korea developed the Korean Utility Helicopter, or KUH. This is a mid-sized utility helicopter, and from 2012 the Korean army is committed to buying 300 of them. Thus then came the requirement for new machine guns for these helos: M60s mounted on the previous helicopters were now quite old – especially the ones mounted on UH-1H Hueys, which considerable numbers of them remained from the Vietnam war, so the army hoped to buy new 7.62NATO machine guns for the new helos. Initially, the army wanted to buy from foreign vendors (especially FNH, who suggested the M240H), but both the army and a Korean company, S&amp;T Motive, the only military small arms manufacturer in Korea, saw a new chance to develop an indigenous 7.62mm machine gun. <div class="img " style="width:100%px;">
	<a><img decoding="async"  alt="" width="100%" data-src="http://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/k1204.jpg" class="lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /></a>
	<div>Removing the spade grip is very simple. Just open the trigger bar, remove two pins (release pin stopper with thumb), then remove the spade grip. </div>
</div> <a><img decoding="async"  alt="" width="100%" data-src="http://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/k1205.jpg" class="lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /></a> While a few hundred machine guns for helicopters were not enough reason to develop a new machine gun, there was enough chance to replace the other old M60s as well. The Korean army has to maintain a considerable number of them for their tanks and armored cars. The army has more than 2,300 tanks, which usually has two M60s each, and a similar number of armoured cars that were armed with one M60 each. Additionally, because of U.S. experience in Iraq and Afghan, many in the ROK army now demand 7.62 MGs back to infantry outfits. Once the South Korean army buys considerable numbers of them, the export market will open up. Consequently, S&amp;T Motive began developing a new machine gun under the name of XK-12 in July 2010. XK-12 prototypes began to be mounted and tested on KUH helicopter prototypes, but by that time, the XK-12 had already fired 300,000 rounds without any serious problems. From 2012, XK-12 was then adopted as the K-12 light machine gun to ROK army and as standard armament on the KUH. Full production is now under way. <div class="img " style="width:100%px;">
	<a><img decoding="async"  alt="" width="100%" data-src="http://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/k1206.jpg" class="lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /></a>
	<div>The rear sight is a ladder type, which can be use out to 1,800m. This can be removed via rail.</div>
</div> <b>Basic Design and Characteristic</b> K-12 is gas operated, with gas piston and rotating bolt, and feeding is done by typical STANAG M13 disintegrating belt link. This gun is based upon the K3 machine gun in terms of basic design, layout and function and is quite similar to the K3. Even the safety is the same as K3/Minimi (very typical cross-bolt type). But unlike the K3, it can’t be fed by magazine. The receiver is made from steel press, but the feed cover is machined from aluminum alloy. This doesn’t pose any problem as the original FN Minimi, the basis of the K3 machine gun, had already been converted into the “Maximi,” or Mk.48 and serves quite well in the U.S. and other armed forces. The K-12 is not just a 7.62 conversion of the K3. While the basic design is quite similar, the K-12’s receiver size is larger than the K3, and many important parts were enlarged to accommodate the larger ammunition. <div class="img " style="width:100%px;">
	<a><img decoding="async"  alt="" width="100%" data-src="http://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/k1207.jpg" class="lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /></a>
	<div>K-12 with feed cover open. Internally, it is very similar to the K3, but mostly enlarged to accommodate the 7.62NATO cartridge. </div>
</div> That’s one reason this weapon weighs 12kg, which is somewhat heavy for this class of machine gun. But there’s another reason; unlike other helicopter mounted machine guns, it has pistol grip, spade grip and metal sliding stock. Most other machine guns have to choose either one of them, not all; but since the K-12 has all of them on one gun, once this gun is dismounted the operator can convert this into a ground-fire machine gun within seconds. All he needs to do is remove two pins, remove the spade grip, unfold the stock and fire it. The folding stock design is very similar to FN Minimi’s Para version. Other than that, the K-12 is not that different from other gas-operated machine guns. It has a folding bipod (again similar to the K3), quick change barrel and gas regulator. If one is familiar with Minimi or Maximi, you almost don’t need to learn how to assemble or disassemble this gun; except spade grip. The flash hider is a four-prong design, which also can be seen on the M240H. It also has a folding ring sight for firing on fast-moving helicopters, but it also has a folding ladder type sight for more accurate aiming. This sight is attached on a Mil-Std 1913 rail so it can easily be removed and replaced. Within 500 meters the sight can be used in its down position; over 500 meters and the sight has to be raised. The sight has a range of 1,800 meters. The Mil-Std 1913 rail is on the feed cover and also on both sides of the handguard. While no configuration of laser sight or optical sight has been decided on yet, the ROK army thinks they would use some kind of electro-optical accessories on the K-12 within the near future. It also can adopt night vision sights with those rails, especially the one on the feed cover. <div class="img " style="width:100%px;">
	<a><img decoding="async"  alt="" width="100%" data-src="http://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/k1208.jpg" class="lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /></a>
	<div>The K12 has a telescopic stock, pistol grip and spade grip, so you can use the same gun for both mounted and dismounted operations. Even when used with the spade grip, the original trigger is used via a trigger bar.</div>
</div> <b>Fire and Operation</b> This author had a chance to visit S&amp;T Motive’s factory last year and fire the K-12 machine gun. This was a rare opportunity as the ROK is quite strict on details of military weapons. But this also shows S&amp;T Motive’s confidence in K-12’s quality. The weapon we tested was one fresh from the assembly line, which was scheduled to be shipped to end users very soon. Firing was done from pistol grip/folding stock and also from the spade grip – while only supported by the bipods. Recoil was not that strong in either firing position and caused no problem when fired. Since I had some experience with the M249 SAW, using the K-12 was very easy and instinctive. <div class="img " style="width:100%px;">
	<a><img decoding="async"  alt="" width="100%" data-src="http://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/k1209.jpg" class="lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /></a>
	<div> The bipod is also very similar to the Minimi and K3. Length can be adjusted to three positions. It is also strengthened to accommodate the weight of the K-12. </div>
</div> Operation was flawless. About 250 rounds were fired within a few minutes without any malfunction, jam, overheating or failure of any kind. A few long bursts of 10-20 rounds were also fired, again without any problems. The flash hider on the muzzle also worked quite well. While the day we fired was considerably cloudy, we could see almost no muzzle flash. One thing worthy of mention and quite impressive was the ejection. The ejection port is located very similar to the Minimi, and spent cases were virtually thrown away very hard. Feeding was also quite positive and flawless as during the firing sequences no one supported the belt. <div class="img " style="width:100%px;">
	<a><img decoding="async"  alt="" width="100%" data-src="http://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/k1210.jpg" class="lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /></a>
	<div>The folding telescopic stock is very similar to that of Minimi Para and is used in just the same way.</div>
</div> <b>Overall Impression</b> The K-12 is not that special of a gun with a relatively conventional design. But put three things (spade grip, pistol grip and stock) on a single gun is unique and an interesting feature, which probably makes dismounted operation much easier. Weight is somewhat heavy, but the 12kg weight is not that different from the M240 or MG3. And since it’s used on helicopters, not by foot soldiers, the weight would not be a problem. If the infantry requires the K-12, making a lighter version would not be a problem since you simply replace both pistol grip and folding stock with single polymer stock, which probably can save considerable weight. It is, in all aspects, better than the M60 it replaces, and already ROK helicopter crews appreciate its ease of operation compared to the M60. Field reliability and rigidity is another matter, but as it’s a new weapon, it should have good potential once it proves itself in ROK service. The chance of good sales in export markets is promising and as the K3 machine guns are sold to some countries with good reputation, the K-12 also can appeal to existing K3 users and potential MG users as well. Right now, only the helicopter-mounted version is adopted and purchased by the ROK military. But the infantry version is also suggested by S&amp;T Motive, and other versions would follow as soon as requirements appear. <b>Specifications</b> Weight: 12kg Caliber: 7.62mm NATO Length: 1.234m w/ stock fully extended Barrel length: 559mm Rifling: four, right hand twist Cyclic Rate: 650~950 rpm <a><img decoding="async"  alt="" align="right" data-src="http://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/article_end.png" class="lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The K14 Sniper Rifle</title>
		<link>https://sadefensejournal.com/the-k14-sniper-rifle/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SADJ Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2013 22:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[New Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search By Issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V5N3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Acquisition and Purchase Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H.B. Hong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K14]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Korean DAPA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadefensejournal.com/wp/?p=2073</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In December of 2012, the Korean company S&#038;T Motive received a contract with South Korean DAPA (Defense Acquisition and Purchase Agency; an agency who performs all government defense purchasing) to supply 3.2 billion won (close to 3 million USD) worth of K14 sniper rifles with all optics and accessories, including training ammunition.  These are for the Korean Army for delivery during 2013.  This is the first time the ROK (Republic of Korea) Army has purchased a large number of sniper rifles, and the K14....]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In December of 2012, the Korean company S&amp;T Motive received a contract with South Korean DAPA (Defense Acquisition and Purchase Agency; an agency who performs all government defense purchasing) to supply 3.2 billion won (close to 3 million USD) worth of K14 sniper rifles with all optics and accessories, including training ammunition.  These are for the Korean Army for delivery during 2013.  This is the first time the ROK (Republic of Korea) Army has purchased a large number of sniper rifles, and the K14 is the first indigenously designed and manufactured sniper rifle in Korea.</p>
<p>Until the late 1970s, the Korean army maintained a small amount of the M1 Garand sniper variants M1C and M1D, usually with an early generation night vision sight with IR light attached.  There’s no evidence that the ROK Army had serious thoughts about sniping and sniper rifles; “Sniper” had never achieved a permanent MOS in the Korean army.  No systematic sniper training had been offered, and “sniper” usually meant “good marksman,” not a specialized marksman with specialized equipment, training and mission: just a soldier who just shot very well.  Simply speaking, nobody thought seriously about sniping/snipers as part of a special job.  After the M1 rifles became obsolete, their sniper variants were also obsolete and disappeared from inventory.</p>
<div class="img " style="width:100%px;">
	<a><img decoding="async"  alt="" width="100%" data-src="http://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/k14_1.jpg" class="lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /></a>
	<div>Left side view of the K14. The Schmidt &amp; Bender scope installed here is not the one issued by the ROK Army, just one attached by S&amp;T Motive.</div>
</div>
<p>In the late 1980s, a small number of optical sights, which were basically a copy of the British SUIT (which is just called Trilux in the Korean army), were issued and mounted on then-new K2 rifles; the rifles with the SUIT copy were issued to frontline troops stationed around the DMZ.  There were not many issued, and they were used similar to today’s DMR concept, but this was also not official in the system.  Actually, during this author’s years of Korean military small arms research, there have only been a few occasions that the sight was seen actually mounted on a rifle.  It was the closest thing to a sniper that the regular ROK Army had, and the ROK Army really had no interest in designated sniper rifles.</p>
<p>This was interesting, because the ROK Army has experienced considerable sniper threats during two wars; North Korean and Chinese Communist snipers harassed ROK positions during the 1951-1953 era and North Vietnamese snipers also caused considerable damage to ROK troops during the American-Vietnam War.  Yet with all those experiences, the ROK Army didn’t have much interest in sniping.  This doesn’t make much sense, considering what they face across the DMZ every day.</p>
<p>Of course, some Korean military organizations purchased small amounts of sniper rifles during the last three decades; but virtually all of them were for Special Forces such as ROK Army and Marines Force Recon. Until recently the Korean military mindset was that sniping is only a Special Forces’ job, especially the counter-terror units. That is a small percentage of the forces.</p>
<div class="img " style="width:100%px;">
	<a><img decoding="async"  alt="" width="100%" data-src="http://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/k14_2.jpg" class="lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /></a>
	<div>4-Prong type flash hider to reduce muzzle flash.</div>
</div>
<p>That mindset began to change during the mid-2000s.  Many officers in the Korean Army &#8211; mainly young ones &#8211; were now interested in sniping, and their experiences in Iraq and Afghanistan (a few thousand ROK troops fought in both places) gave good insight to the value of sniping.  The ROK has realized that the North Koreans also maintain a considerable sniper force.  Similar to Russians, North Korea produced large amount of semi-auto sniper rifles and spread the snipers usually to the platoon level, and in some cases even to squad levels.  Facing that high a concentration of trained snipers with special equipment, the ROK Army has realized from its recent combat experiences that it needs to evolve the sniper role.</p>
<p>By 2011, specific requirements for a new sniper rifle were completed; around 800-1,000 rifles were supposed to be purchased, and the rifle would be bolt action, 7.62x51mm, with appropriate optics and accessories.  Originally, it was open to foreign direct purchase, but at that point S&amp;T Daewoo (now S&amp;T Motive) entered into the competition with their own design, the XK14 rifle.  Since Korean law gives priority to indigenous manufacturers for defense procurement, the XK14 became a prime candidate for the new sniper rifle program, and underwent tests for certification.  It passed all the tests that the army gave, and during December 2012 it became the new sniper rifle for the ROK Army general issue and was officially designated as the K14 rifle.</p>
<div class="img " style="width:100%px;">
	<a><img decoding="async"  alt="" width="100%" data-src="http://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/k14_3.jpg" class="lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /></a>
	<div>The magazine can easily be removed using the large paddle-type magazine catch, even with gloved hands.</div>
</div>
<p><b>Description</b><br />
The K14 is a bolt action rifle with turn-bolt action, in 7.62x51mm NATO caliber.  It is a very typical bolt action with not too many special or exotic features.  Since Korea has virtually no experience in this field, it’s natural that they were not trying to venture into something totally new and unproven.</p>
<p>One interesting thing is that this rifle is roughly based upon the Winchester Model 70 rifle, while many other recent bolt action rifles follow examples of more modern designs, such as the Remington M700 action or Accuracy International’s AW series.  We can’t be sure what the reason was for this choice, and S&amp;T Motive has not discussed this.</p>
<p>The K14 has some ‘modern’ features in its action, of course.  For example, its bolt opens at 60 degrees to allow faster repeating shots, and the manual safety moves 90 degrees for on/off, while the original M70 moves 180 degrees.</p>
<p>The stock is made with fiberglass-reinforced polymer and it has a thumbhole pistol grip and fully adjustable cheek pad/butt plate with height adjustable monopod.  It has an internal metallic frame, and the barreled action is bedded on that frame.  This frame is also being used as a platform to support a 4-way rail handguard, which is used for accommodating optics or other needed accessories.</p>
<div class="img " style="width:100%px;">
	<a><img decoding="async"  alt="" width="100%" data-src="http://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/k14_4.jpg" class="lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /></a>
	<div>The K14 has little muzzle flash, and the recoil is not too strong considering its relative compactness.</div>
</div>
<p>The magazine is a detachable box type, with 5-round capacity as the basic and 10-rounds optional.  This is detached via a paddle type magazine catch, which is quite large and easy to operate, even with a gloved hand.</p>
<p>The barrel is fluted, with a length of approximately 610mm.  There is a four-prong type flash hider, and while the ROK Army hasn’t required a sound suppressor yet, one can be mounted after removing the flash hider.</p>
<p>Overall length is 1.15 meters, and with the empty weight of 5.5kg (w/o scope), this gun is relatively light and small compared to its barrel length.  As can be seen, the engineers at S&amp;T Motive worked to reduce the size of the weapon, and their effort seems to have paid off.</p>
<p>The receiver is a short one, which can accommodate .308 (7.62x51mm) but not .300 or .338.  The ROK Army requirement was strictly on .308, so S&amp;T Motive felt no reason to spend more money for the quite narrow chance of future upgrade.</p>
<div class="img " style="width:100%px;">
	<a><img decoding="async"  alt="" width="100%" data-src="http://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/k14_5.jpg" class="lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /></a>
	<div>The safety is also similar to the Model 70, but only moves 90 degrees to ensure fast operation.</div>
</div>
<p>A few scopes are considered as the basic optics for use. The Schmidt &amp; Bender PMII is one, and the Leupold Mk4 is another. A Korean made optic is also considered, but the ROK Army is hoping to buy better quality foreign ones. They understand the optic is at least as important as the rifle itself.</p>
<p><b>From Our Test</b><br />
The K14 is a somewhat simple and typical bolt action rifle, which is relatively easy to operate and maintain.  If you’re familiar with the Model 700 or the Model 70, then you can operate it without much additional training.</p>
<p>What this writer examined and fired was a prototype, and it still had some things to be fixed; cycling was not that smooth, and trigger was also not that good.  The production models will be smoothed out.  We fired the weapon at S&amp;T Motive’s range during a visit in March, 2012 and this article is written during February, 2013 when we’re allowed to discuss this rifle.  Smoothing out trigger and bolt are in the final production.</p>
<div class="img " style="width:100%px;">
	<a><img decoding="async"  alt="" width="100%" data-src="http://sadefensejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/k14_6.jpg" class="lazy" src="data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E" /></a>
	<div>The K14 uses a detachable box magazine. This is a 5-round mag, but there is also a 10-round magazine available.</div>
</div>
<p>Compactness is a very positive aspect of this rifle.  Compared to the original M70 or Remington M700 series of rifles it is relatively compact and easy to handle.  Lack of a folding stock can be a drawback, but it probably would not become a serious fault.  With a length of 1.15m, the K14 won’t be hard to carry in the field, even in the mountainous terrain that is typical in Korea.  While light and compact, this rifle’s recoil is not that pronounced, probably due to the stock design, which is quite close to the barrel axis, and the muzzle brake/flash hider.</p>
<p>In terms of accuracy, the ROK Army’s minimum requirements were less than 1 MOA at 100 meters and a minimum 800 meters of effective range.  Since S&amp;T Motive had little experience with sniper rifles, they had a learning curve to achieve those goals; and finally succeeding in doing so.</p>
<p>Overall, the K14 is not the greatest sniper rifle, but it’s definitely not a bad one.  It will probably be a very good tool for the new snipers of the ROK Army.  It has enough accuracy to counter the North Korean snipers armed with their semi-auto sniper rifles, which are roughly based upon Romanian PSL and Serbian M76 rifles.</p>
<p>The K14 is sold as a package to the ROK Army; it includes the rifle, a quality daytime scope, clip on in-line night vision sight, training ammunition, ghillie suit and other necessary accessories for sniper training and missions.  The price per system is approximately $13,000 USD equivalent.  Exact price of the rifle is unknown, but should be significantly less than the whole package.  Right now this rifle is being offered to the Jordanian army, and S&amp;T Motive says small amounts were already sold to some foreign buyers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
